Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 68474 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #272 on: July 15, 2018, 10:17:05 PM »
Advertisement

You've said it yourself Iacoletti, "All the evidence leads to Oswald" and until you can convince anyone that this evidence was fabricated, we have evidence that by your definition must be accepted in Court as proof as Oswald's guilt.

Reminds me of a Henry Fonda movie called '12 Angry Men'.
Anyone ever see it?
Eleven guys just simply refused to believe in a reasonable doubt.
But after hours of deliberation...jurist Fonda got the unanimous acquittal that the lawyers couldn't seem to demonstrate....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #272 on: July 15, 2018, 10:17:05 PM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #273 on: July 15, 2018, 10:33:51 PM »
Show us photographs of JFK's head in its 'blown off' state.

There.  Happy?

« Last Edit: July 15, 2018, 10:36:29 PM by Michael Walton »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #274 on: July 15, 2018, 10:36:33 PM »
Reminds me of a Henry Fonda movie called '12 Angry Men'.
Anyone ever see it?
Eleven guys just simply refused to believe in a reasonable doubt.
But after hours of deliberation...jurist Fonda got the unanimous acquittal that the lawyers couldn't seem to demonstrate....




You know Jerry, there is a lot more to researching this case than watching Henry Fonda movies!? God bless ya!



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #274 on: July 15, 2018, 10:36:33 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #275 on: July 15, 2018, 10:47:28 PM »

But why would a lone nut choose to shoot the president at a time when at least 80 percent of his body was concealed and protected by the body of his limousine either?





-sigh- You've just answered Bugliosi's question and positively reinforced his conclusion, of course shooting a man who was moving and had most of his body concealed made a difficult job even more difficult but Oswald only had that one option. Whereas your massive conspiracy of people who had control over the FBI, the Dallas Police and the WC themselves could have easily killed Kennedy anywhere they liked!



JohnM

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #276 on: July 16, 2018, 03:47:40 AM »


It's the 'Kidnapper-In-Chief' who is deplorable
And you claimed in another thread that LNers are not interested in the truth
 

Who is this 'kidnapper' ?...Cut down on the liquor there.
Produce that post that you refer to... 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #276 on: July 16, 2018, 03:47:40 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #277 on: July 16, 2018, 07:23:57 AM »
Who is this 'kidnapper' ?...Cut down on the liquor there.
Produce that post that you refer to...

Donald Trump = The Kidnapper-In-Chief
(as opposed to Commander-In-Chief)

Related to his having kids removed from their parents at the border

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #279 on: July 16, 2018, 02:08:45 PM »
Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #6.

Speaking of silly arguments: 

"I don't think a conspiracy would have been done that way, therefore there was no conspiracy".

 Thumb1: +++
Could we find one that isn't silly?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #279 on: July 16, 2018, 02:08:45 PM »