Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[John Iacoletti]

-sigh- You've just answered Bugliosi's question and positively reinforced his conclusion, of course shooting a man who was moving and had most of his body concealed made a difficult job even more difficult but Oswald only had that one option.

So you really do think that it's some hard and fast rule that an assassination has to be done from one's place of employment.

Somebody should have told Guiteau and Czolgosz.

Whereas your massive conspiracy of people who had control over the FBI, the Dallas Police and the WC themselves could have easily killed Kennedy anywhere they liked!

Sorry, that massive conspiracy is an LN strawman.

[John Iacoletti]

No, my standard remains at reasonable, both-feet-on-the-ground levels...

Yawn, everybody thinks his own unsubstantiated opinion is "reasonable".

[John Iacoletti]

You've said it yourself Iacoletti, "All the evidence leads to Oswald" and until you can convince anyone that this evidence was fabricated, we have evidence that by your definition must be accepted in Court as proof as Oswald's guilt.

The little "evidence" that you have is weak, circumstantial, and tainted.  It comes nowhere near anything resembling a proof.

[Jerry Freeman]

I must have missed the trial. When was that?

It is on YouTube [I will not link it]
Just search the trial of Lee Harvey Oswald
Bugliosi had a mock trial ..I think it was in England for some reason.
The show starred Vince Bugliosi
Introducing Vince Bugliosi
Persecutor was Vincent Bugliosi...with a judge, jury, and defense attorney appointed by Mr Bugliosi.

[John Mytton]

29. One other indication that Oswald?s decision to kill the president was essentially spontaneous (and therefore, devoid of any conspiracy with others) and formed sometime after the route of the president?s motorcade in front of Oswald?s workplace first became public only three days before the assassination, is his lack of planning to ensure his survival. Although Oswald wanted to survive?he tried to escape, and also physically resisted arrest, striking the arresting officer and drawing his revolver before it was wrenched away from him?he apparently never thought out his escape, even to the obvious point of bringing his revolver to work with him so that he would have it to defend and extricate himself from any possible confrontation with the authorities after his attempt on the president?s life the next day. Instead, he admitted during his interrogation by Captain Fritz of the Dallas Police Department that after he left the Book Depository Building following the assassination, he went back to his room at 1026 North Beckley in Dallas and got his revolver.
RHVB


JohnM

[John Mytton]

The little "evidence" that you have is weak, circumstantial, and tainted.  It comes nowhere near anything resembling a proof.

Hmmmm, on one side we have Loony Toons John Iacoletti and on the other we have one of the most successfully brilliant lawyers of all time Vincent Bugliosi!

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

There.  Happy?

Kennedy had a moustache, was bald on top and wore glasses?

[Bill Chapman]

So you really do think that it's some hard and fast rule that an assassination has to be done from one's place of employment.

Where did JohnM mention anything about any options re location?
By the time Oswald took aim he had only about 20% of the target available.

Yet you avoid that by veering off course and offer up some goofy nonsense about other shooters in completely different circumstances.