Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Matt Grantham]

"I choose to believe". That say's it all.

 Forming conclusions is not a deliberate process?

[Matt Grantham]

Again, a shot from the right-front does not throw the head and body violently back and to the left.

 What does it do?

[Bill Brown]

But apparently according to Brown a shot from the right-rear does. 🤣

No.

I've never said anything close to that.

[Howard Gee]

5.Lee Harvey Oswald's other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy. 

.Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building. 

Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy.

Was that after he told BRW to vacate the 6th floor and to hand him over his chicken lunch?

No, that would be after BRW finished his lunch and went down a flght to be with his two buddies and watch the motorcade.

Inexplicably, Saint Oz was one of the very few employees that couldn't be bothered to watch the President go by and whose whereabouts when the shots were fired are unknown.

But let's ignore the fact that the assassination rifle was found on the 6th floor with his prints on it, and concentrate on whether Oswald got to munch on BRW's chicken bones.

Hey, maybe that's what happened to the rubber chicken Oz carried into the depository in a 3 foot bag. BRW ate it.

BUGLIOSI HAS THE KOOKS PEGGED

[Michael Walton]

Again, a shot from the right-front does not throw the head and body violently back and to the left.


The link you provided stated the following...

"The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy."

The HSCA had no idea what sort of conspiracy existed, if any at all.

This doesn't even mention their faulty conclusion based on the supposed rifle fire caught on the dictabelt recording, even though the impulses were recorded once the motorcade was on it's way to Parkland Hospital.

You wish to claim that the HSCA "got it right", yet you claim, based on your opinion on the way the body went back and to the left, that the President was struck by a shot from the knoll.  The HSCA stated that the President was struck twice, both from behind and both from above.  it sounds like you're contradicting yourself.

Uhh, yes it does Bill. I have another video showing someone taking a shot to the front of their head and their head is blown backwards like Kennedy's.  We simply do not know how any gunshot wound to the head is going to cause movement to it but there is visual evidence that it can happen.

And as for the HSCA, you can make all the excuses you want to but they did say there were shots from the front.  That's a  conclusion written by a government body, the same type of body as the Warren report was.  And don't forget Bill, THEY didn't know what the hell to say either except for one thing - that it was going to be all Oswald, all of the time.  They had a preordained conclusion from on up high. So they massaged the photographic and other evidence to reach that conclusion. Seriously, Bill, do you know how many witnesses alone that were not even interviewed for the Warren report? One that a simple massage of what they said would be too obvious to be dishonest?

If you ask me, the HSCA, despite all of their own faults, were a little more interested in the real truth of what happened than the Warren gang ever was.

[Zeon Mason]

1, Oswald went home on a Thursday, instead of his usual Friday ride with BWF. There could be ONE and ONLY ONE reason for this: Oswald needed to get his rifle from the Paines garage 


2, Oswald left $170 and his ring for Marina and HIS CHILDREN, after the bad news she wanted a divorce. There could be ONE and ONLY ONE reason for this: Oswald was going to shoot JFK   

3.A light was left on the in Paines garage. There is ONE and ONLY one reason for this: Oswald went into the garage to get his rifle and left the light on.


Soon the Bugliiosi mole hill of "evidence" will grow even larger into a MOUNTAIN of 

[Bill Chapman]

Uhh, yes it does Bill. I have another video showing someone taking a shot to the front of their head and their head is blown backwards like Kennedy's.  We simply do not know how any gunshot wound to the head is going to cause movement to it but there is visual evidence that it can happen.

And as for the HSCA, you can make all the excuses you want to but they did say there were shots from the front.  That's a  conclusion written by a government body, the same type of body as the Warren report was.  And don't forget Bill, THEY didn't know what the hell to say either except for one thing - that it was going to be all Oswald, all of the time.  They had a preordained conclusion from on up high. So they massaged the photographic and other evidence to reach that conclusion. Seriously, Bill, do you know how many witnesses alone that were not even interviewed for the Warren report? One that a simple massage of what they said would be too obvious to be dishonest?

If you ask me, the HSCA, despite all of their own faults, were a little more interested in the real truth of what happened than the Warren gang ever was.

'I have another video showing someone taking a shot to the front of their head and their head is blown backwards like Kennedy's
> Links please

[Steve Howsley]

'I have another video showing someone taking a shot to the front of their head and their head is blown backwards like Kennedy's
> Links please

I'd also like to see a link to the video.