Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Steve Howsley]

If Lee constructed CE 142, it had to be in situ at the wrapping bench in the first floor. The same place where there were wrappers and the offices of Truly and Shelley. Just when do you think he did that?

Save it for The Bag thread. I lost interest in that issue weeks ago. I mean, 200+ pages is more than enough.

[Howard Gee]

If Oswald admitted his crimes the game was over. By game I mean exactly that; his attitude was 'you find the answers 'cause I'm way smarter than you guys.' An admission would see him languishing in jail awaiting his trial with the certainty IMO of a spell on death row and a pathetic execution. So long as the game was in play he got the attention he so clearly craved. I agree that the evidence was overwhelming but that little insecure attention seeker would have lied his way to the very end so long as it meant the spotlight was on him.

 

[Steve Howsley]

Trust me, if I was a LNer - that's one thread I would avoid at all costs.

Talk it up as much as you like. It's a non-event for me. 200 + pages with some photographs posted dozens (literally) of times with the same limited discussion going around and around getting nowhere. That's what it is.

[Steve Howsley]

You left out the most probable location: the packing bench at the depository.

According to the evidence.

Confirming you have no clue about the evidence so why bother posting your rants in the first place when you have nothing to contribute?

One thing about you kooks that is consistent across various sites is your hatred for the opinions of other people who see things differently. Par for the course.

I did say "or elsewhere" which can involve your preferred place if you like. I don't really care. If you'd actually think more broadly you might consider the possibility that the materials for the bag making were taken home so the bag could be constructed without the eyes of his coworkers and office staff watching him 'steal' materials for what was obviously his private use.


I think you might be the clueless one here.

[Steve Howsley]

No and it proves you didn't read my OP about the bag making process.

Like I said, take it to the Bag thread.

[Steve Howsley]

FBI testimony suggests the tape was most likely pulled and applied at the packing table based on the working of the dispenser.

Thanks for reconfirming your ignorance concerning the evidence.

I suggest you confine your rants to PM when entertaining your inbred mates at the troll farm.

You seem to be a pretty nasty piece of work Tom. I hope that's not the case. Is it because I think Oswald is not only guilty as sin but that he was a despicable husband and father? Tough if that offends you.

First of all, according to you the FBI say 'most likely'. That's not a definite in my book. Could the tape be dispensed then taken away for use hours later? Packing tapes I've used since the 1970s could be used in the way. They don't adhere quite as well and can be a little messy sticking to itself but it certainly can be done. Any proof that the tape in question was different?

Anyway take it to the Bag thread.

[Howard Gee]

West, did not notice any heavy tape dispenser missing nor Lee anywhere near the wrapping tables.

You pull out the tape, it becomes wet and sticky. You have to use it straight away.

The tape and paper were forensically 100 % identical between CE 677 and CE 142. The tape had the same tiny marks on it as well.

Lee was a terrible husband no question about that. Did he leave a rifle in a blanket knowing that Ruth's children and his eldest daughter played in the garage? Worse still, Marina never said a word about it to Ruth either.

Too bad for you that the tape can be taken off a roll without applying it immediately. Which is why the FBI said 'most likely' instead of 'definitely'.

Also, despite what you suggest, the paper and tape in the packing room were not under 24 hour guard and your hero could have constructed the bag without being seen when Truly and the paper and tape police were eating lunch or taking a dump.

Even worse for you is Saint Oz's prints magically appearing on the bag you insist Studebaker created.

Take your "I have a hypothesis about a paper bag, Fritz and Wade sent an innocent young man to his death." garbage back to the 200 page waste of bandwith, where it belongs.

I'll be happy to continue demolishing your 'hypothesis' there.

We're busy discussing what a murdering, lying, creep, POS, your innocent young hero was.

[Ray Mitcham]

Too bad for you that the tape can be taken off a roll without applying it immediately. Which is why the FBI said 'most likely' instead of 'definitely'.

Howard, please read what Tony actually said. The tape had to be dispensed via the wetting roller which made marks on the paper. The marks were on the tape therefore the tape went through the wetting roller. If it hadn't it would't have had the marks that the wetting roller made. Capisce?

Also, despite what you suggest, the paper and tape in the packing room were not under 24 hour guard and your hero could have constructed the bag without being seen when Truly and the paper and tape police were eating lunch or taking a dump.

The tape minder said he never left his post even for lunch.

Even worse for you is Saint Oz's prints magically appearing on the bag you insist Studebaker created.

Ask yourself, could Fritz have handed the bag that Studebaker created to Oswald?

Take your "I have a hypothesis about a paper bag, Fritz and Wade sent an innocent young man to his death." garbage back to the 200 page waste of bandwith, where it belongs.

It is a matter of record that  the DPD sent a number of innocent men to their death.