Z Film & Other Evidence Makes Conspiracy VERY CLEAR

[Mitch Todd]

I agree with you 100%. Ive watched the z film close to 100 times today and I cannot see the man move into position and fire one bit.

Blevins' "rifleman"  is in the same spot in each frame on most frames in the Z film. And it doesn't change. It's an artifact caused by a piece of gunk in Zapruder's camera.

[John Kozlowski]

Blevins' "rifleman"  is in the same spot in each frame on most frames in the Z film. And it doesn't change. It's an artifact caused by a piece of gunk in Zapruder's camera.

I might go as far as to say maybe someone was watching from the roof, MAYBE a lookout.  But I'm leaning more towards your explanation. Whatever it is it's not a shooter.

[Chris Bristow]

You would not expect reflected images in the Z film to be present in the Bell because they were looking in very different directions. If you did see the same reflected image in both that would be possible evidence of fakery.

[Royell Storing]

You would not expect reflected images in the Z film to be present in the Bell because they were looking in very different directions. If you did see the same reflected image in both that would be possible evidence of fakery.

          I continue to hear Blevins and people on this Forum referring to that Image being a REFLECTED IMAGE. REFLECTED off of what?

[Royell Storing]

Blevins' "rifleman"  is in the same spot in each frame on most frames in the Z film. And it doesn't change. It's an artifact caused by a piece of gunk in Zapruder's camera.

        If You are going to proffer that there was a "piece of GUNK in Zapruder's camera" which produced this Image between the sprocket holes, You are essentially discrediting the Entire Zapruder Film.  If the camera is unreliable due to "Gunk" in the camera, then the Images it produces are also Unreliable.

[Mitch Todd]

        If You are going to proffer that there was a "piece of GUNK in Zapruder's camera" which produced this Image between the sprocket holes, You are essentially discrediting the Entire Zapruder Film.  If the camera is unreliable due to "Gunk" in the camera, then the Images it produces are also Unreliable.

Do you really believe that, or can you not think of anything else to say? That image is in the same spot in every frame from the beginning of the film until the end. That is, from before the limousine first appears until after the limousine disappears underneath the triple overpass. How you or Blevins can think that it would be the reflection of something outside of the camera is simply beyond me.

[Chris Bristow]

I thought he was talking about something reflective on the housing around the lens on the outside and front of the camera.

[Royell Storing]

Do you really believe that, or can you not think of anything else to say? That image is in the same spot in every frame from the beginning of the film until the end. That is, from before the limousine first appears until after the limousine disappears underneath the triple overpass. How you or Blevins can think that it would be the reflection of something outside of the camera is simply beyond me.

          YOU have claimed that "GUNK in the camera" is responsible for that Image. If this is true, All images produced by that camera become questionable.  This renders the images on the Current Zapruder Film unreliable.