More Fake Pictures of Oswald

[John Iacoletti]

Prove him wrong

and Chapman always ends up reverting back to shifting the burden of proof.

[John Iacoletti]

Iacoletti, it's about time you came to grips with reality, you're basically just a Bum who has no technical expertise in any aspect of this case yet you continually set yourself as some sort of Ultimate Arbiter and with absolutely no evidence you keep giving us your "false appeal to your own personal opinion" as scientific refutation, you're just embarrassing yourself.

Says the armchair photogrammetrist who has no technical expertise and continually regurgitates any nonsense that confirms his predetermined biases.

"Expert" said it, "Mytton" believes it, and that settles it.

[John Iacoletti]

These are is images that the Apple face id sees, all these little dots are used to create a depth map of someone's face and since our faces are all unique this form of identification is virtually infallible.

This is all very interesting and technical sounding, and it has ZERO to do with your contrived morphs and the sweeping generalizations you make from them.

[John Iacoletti]

Careful or John may resort to using his "strawman" rebuttal or the devastating "LOL" as in "Oswald's rifle - LOL."

Calling it "Oswald's rifle" doesn't actually demonstrate that it was Oswald's rifle.

I know you wish it did.

[Jerry Freeman]

 
Btw what on Earth is "infliable"?

It just doesn't fli



 
 

[John Mytton]

"Expert" said it, "Mytton" believes it, and that settles it.

No, Experts say it and JohnM supplies practical examples to prove it.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

This is all very interesting and technical sounding...

 



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Calling it "Oswald's rifle" doesn't actually demonstrate that it was Oswald's rifle.

LOL!



JohnM