Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Richard Smith]

So John, you are:

- a fence sitter?

- a contrarian?

I would suggest lazy, closet CTer.  The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies.  What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies.  Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.   

[John Iacoletti]

"Reclaiming History":  An exercise in arrogant verbosity and logical fallacies.

After over forty years of the most prodigiously intensive investigation and examination of a murder case in world history, certain powerful facts exist which cannot be challenged:

Of course your "facts" can be challenged, Vince.

Not one weapon other than Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle has ever been found and linked in any way to the assassination.

"Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle".  LOL.

Not one bullet other than the three fired from Oswald?s rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.

Not one bullet from ANY rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.

No person other than Oswald has ever been connected by evidence, in any way, to the assassination.

Other than Roscoe White, E. Howard Hunt, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, James Files, Sam Giancana, Carlos Marcello, Santos Trafficante, Joseph Milteer, Gerry Hemming, Loran Hall, William Seymour, Lawrence Howard . . .

It's Bugliosi and his shameless sycophants who are engaging in "wild speculation, theorizing, and shameless dissembling about the facts of the case" and have been doing so since November 22, 1963.

[John Iacoletti]

I would suggest lazy, closet CTer.  The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies.  What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies.  Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.

Says the guy who has never provided a single scrap of evidence to support his baseless fantasy.  Just a repetitive litany of baseless claims about the evidence.

[Jerry Freeman]

It was a political assassination.
Would it be said that the USA was just another Banana Republic?
So it was covered up from the top down.