Gary Mack and the about face !

[Royell Storing]

Look at the other post I wrote.

We know from what Robinson has told the ARRB and and HSCA investigators, both directly and indirectly, that his job was the cosmetic part.
Also, Robinson confirms Manchester, stating that he rode in with Hagen. Hagen agrees with Manchester that he didn't show up until late.

And Manchester didn't just make up the stuff in his book. He interviewed Powers, Hagen, and two of the Gawlers within about a year of the assassination.

          Your pledging allegiance to the Manchester BOOK and its' 2nd hand information is up to you. My thought is that Tom Robinson would know the elapsed time between his eating dinner while watching the JFK Casket being unloaded from AF1, Suddenly Racing to Bethesda, walking into the morgue, and viewing Humes taking a bone saw to the head of the POTUS. Being Suddenly exposed to Events of this magnitude have a way of sticking with Everyday Joes.   

[Bill Brown]

Pat, so you don't think that someone like Mack, who first pushed a theory of a man dressed as a policeman shot Kennedy (and this man was among the blobs in one of the photos) shot Kennedy, then switches sides and is the star of many shows made by Discovery that were, to say the least, dishonest...is just a tad disingenuous?

Mack did not "switch sides".

Pay attention.  Geez.

[John Mytton]

Other than your dishonest screenshots where you take a frame out of a film sequence when the hand is situated where you want it to be, what Parkland staff described the head wound that you believe in?

No, no, no the eyewitnesses are only the proverbial icing on the cake and are simply reinforcing the authentic Physical Evidence of Xrays, Autopsy photos and movies.

See when eyewitnesses recall reality they all corroborate.



But when eyewitnesses smoke the wacky tobacky they hallucinate all over the place LOLOLOLOL!




Btw which eyewitness is demonstrating a position that didn't have a hole underneath?



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

So, basically you?re saying that all the Parkland personnel reported a back of the head wound because they were toking it up before the assassination? Seems plausible...

[John Mytton]

So, basically you?re saying that all the Parkland personnel reported a back of the head wound because they were toking it up before the assassination? Seems plausible...

So basically your saying that all the following eyewitnesses lied and the authentic physical evidence was somehow faked, please do tell?



Btw how many of your eye witnesses actually touched and examined the head wound?



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

So basically your saying that all the following eyewitnesses lied and the authentic physical evidence was somehow faked, please do tell?

No, I?m saying that 20+ people at Parkland described a back of the head wound.

Btw how many of your eye witnesses actually touched and examined the head wound?

LOL. How many of yours did? Newman? Zapruder?

[John Mytton]

No, I?m saying that 20+ people at Parkland described a back of the head wound.

LOL. How many of yours did? Newman? Zapruder?

No, I?m saying that 20+ people at Parkland described a back of the head wound.

It only happened one way.

LOL. How many of yours did? Newman? Zapruder?

The most important eyewitness is dead center, Humes had the appropriate training and wrote a comprehensive and detailed autopsy report that perfectly reflects all the other professional eyewitnesses.



JohnM

[Mike Orr]

Get over it JM , you're wrong !