Jake,
May I ask why you keep posting these insufferable, blurry, highly pixelated images and expect people to see what you are claiming/asking what is in them?
I must ask you this. I am curious.
If this were introduced as "evidence" in a court room where Oswald is on trial, and you were trying to convince a jury that the images show a "person" or a "rifle", how far do you think you would get? This would be thrown out of the courtroom within a millisecond as soon as the prosecuting attorney saw it, as well as the judge saw it because it is absolutely worthless as evidence or proof of anything. How can you expect people to see what you think you see--when there isn't a slight hint of definition within these images.
Again, I am just curious.