What happened to the Mauser?

[Royell Storing]

The rib is a very thin bone. The damage that the bullet received upon striking it is seen in the longitudinal flattening.

                If a rib caused the "longitudinal flattening" seen on CE399, what damage to CE399 are you attributing to it allegedly Striking/Breaking the Radius Bone?  The Radius being far more dense than a Rib.

[Tim Nickerson]

                If a rib caused the "longitudinal flattening" seen on CE399, what damage to CE399 are you attributing to it allegedly Striking/Breaking the Radius Bone?  The Radius being far more dense than a Rib.

CE-399 never received any damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone. By the time it struck that bone it's velocity had been reduced below that which would cause any deformation to it.

TESTS PROVE THAT THE "PRISTINE BULLET" DOES NOT SUPPORT A JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY

"One bullet traveling at 1108 ft/s and one at 1335 ft/s perforated cadaver radius bones and were caught in the bullet trap. Neither bullet had any deformation whatsoever, except for rifling impressions."

===================================================================



That's the bullet that struck the cadaver radius at 1108 ft/s.

[Royell Storing]

CE-399 never received any damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone. By the time it struck that bone it's velocity had been reduced below that which would cause any deformation to it.

TESTS PROVE THAT THE "PRISTINE BULLET" DOES NOT SUPPORT A JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY

"One bullet traveling at 1108 ft/s and one at 1335 ft/s perforated cadaver radius bones and were caught in the bullet trap. Neither bullet had any deformation whatsoever, except for rifling impressions."

===================================================================



That's the bullet that struck the cadaver radius at 1108 ft/s.

      CE399 hit the Dense radius bone Hard enough to break it. Yet, you are claiming this Impact inflicted No damage what-so-ever to CE399. Just throwing a bullet against a block wall/hard object will inflict some level of damage to the bullet. Your claiming CE399 "Never received ANY Damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone" is so Unbelievable that it DQ's your entire position.   

[Tim Nickerson]

      CE399 hit the Dense radius bone Hard enough to break it. Yet, you are claiming this Impact inflicted No damage what-so-ever to CE399. Just throwing a bullet against a block wall/hard object will inflict some level of damage to the bullet. Your claiming CE399 "Never received ANY Damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone" is so Unbelievable that it DQ's your entire position.

This is not just me claiming that CE399 never received any noticeable damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone. It's wound ballistics experts like the late Martin Fackler not only claiming it but proving that it was possible as well.

TESTS PROVE THAT THE "PRISTINE BULLET" DOES NOT SUPPORT A JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY

"One bullet traveling at 1108 ft/s and one at 1335 ft/s perforated cadaver radius bones and were caught in the bullet trap. Neither bullet had any deformation whatsoever, except for rifling impressions."

===================================================================



That's the bullet that struck the cadaver radius at 1108 ft/s.

[Royell Storing]

This is not just me claiming that CE399 never received any noticeable damage to it from striking and breaking the radius bone. It's wound ballistics experts like the late Martin Fackler not only claiming it but proving that it was possible as well.

TESTS PROVE THAT THE "PRISTINE BULLET" DOES NOT SUPPORT A JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY

"One bullet traveling at 1108 ft/s and one at 1335 ft/s perforated cadaver radius bones and were caught in the bullet trap. Neither bullet had any deformation whatsoever, except for rifling impressions."

===================================================================



That's the bullet that struck the cadaver radius at 1108 ft/s.

            Nice of you to change your previous declaration of, "Never received ANY Damage" to, "Never received Any NOTICEABLE Damage". Why not just admit you got carried away and move on?

[Walt Cakebread]

"Impossible to replicate the alleged shots from the alleged window."

Who ever typed that statement was absolutely correct......

Colin Crow started a thread that is related to this subject....   He posted photos that make it evident that a rifle could not have been fired at JFK down on Elm street from the tiny cramped S.N. (SMOKER'S NOOK.)...

[Tim Nickerson]

            Nice of you to change your previous declaration of, "Never received ANY Damage" to, "Never received Any NOTICEABLE Damage". Why not just admit you got carried away and move on?

What is the difference? If it's not noticeable then how can one say it's been damaged?

[Royell Storing]

What is the difference? If it's not noticeable then how can one say it's been damaged?

         "Noticeable" is far from definitive. How many times have you told a kid with a Zit on his face that, "It's not NOTICEABLE". "Noticeable" is "Eye of the beholder" stuff. This is exactly why you ran there for shelter. You got carried away. Simple as that.