"Ridiculous"? Not Hardly. Those statements are Consistent and Corroborate each other. Why not include SA Landis, (standing on the Passenger side running board of the Queen Mary), and his statement as to seeing a guy running East across the North side of the Knoll toward The Steps as the Queen Mary sped toward the Triple Underpass? Or Sitzman telling Tink Thompson that after dismounting The Perch she Immediately Ran Down the knoll & then came back up it and talked with a G Man who provided ID? And what about Officer Hargis's WC Testimony of his running Up the knoll to the little "brick wall"? How about SA Lem Johns jumping out of the LBJ SS Follow-Up Car, running down Elm St, and then was left standing in the middle of Elm St as the JFK Motorcade sped away? NONE of this lengthy list is on Any assassination image(s) yet you naively throw in with Uncle Sam's long time buddy = The Kodak Connection.
How can you be atop the TU and claim that a policeman ran or on his bike went up the grassy incline towards the TSBD?
That's not what they saw and it's not what they said, it is of course ridiculous.
That's the FEDs making less work for themselves. Having these witnesses describing a cop running toward their direction, the wrong direction, creates another line of enquiry to follow, if he's running toward the building they can turn it in and forgedaboutit.
Is that any clearer?