JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Gerry Down on February 14, 2021, 09:29:16 AM

Title: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on February 14, 2021, 09:29:16 AM
This claim seems to be going back all the way to the 1990's. As an example, in her ARRB testimony Ann Goodpasture said "there are 2,000 – over 2,000 books already been written."

I heard James Tague once say he owned 500 books in relation to the Kennedy assassination and Walt Brown say he amassed a library of 1000 books in relation to the assassination. I don't know how many books are in the 6th Floor Museum library. One would presume that library would have pretty much every book ever written on the assassination.

Is the 2000 books claim true? And how many books are there now in 2021 I wonder?
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: W. Tracy Parnell on February 14, 2021, 05:10:32 PM
Bugliosi reported 933 books "dealing exclusively with the assassination" as of 2006. Andy Winiarczyk of the Last Hurrah Book Shop told Bugliosi the 2000 figure was "too high." (Reclaiming History Endnotes, pp. 2-3)
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on February 14, 2021, 05:21:15 PM
This claim seems to be going back all the way to the 1990's. As an example, in her ARRB testimony Ann Goodpasture said "there are 2,000 – over 2,000 books already been written."

I heard James Tague once say he owned 500 books in relation to the Kennedy assassination and Walt Brown say he amassed a library of 1000 books in relation to the assassination. I don't know how many books are in the 6th Floor Museum library. One would presume that library would have pretty much every book ever written on the assassination.

Is the 2000 books claim true? And how many books are there now in 2021 I wonder?
If the definition is "in relation to the assassination" then I would guess the thousands figure is likely true. Or close. That's kind of a vague definition though. Does a book on JFK's life - the Robert Dallek book for example which discusses the assassination - apply? How about a book on RFK that talks about his reaction to the assassination? What about Robert Caro's book on LBJ? He discusses the assassination and how LBJ reacted to it.

But I don't think that's what we are talking about. I would think books "only about the assassination" - English only? - are 1000 or so. But I would also guess (lotta' guessing here) that many or most were self-published or issued by small publishers and not major companies.

Amazon books has more than 50 pages with 35 books on each page under the search "JFK assassination." Some are directly about it; others less so. One is about how JFK was killed to prevent him from revealing the alien presence around us. No thanks, I'll wait for the paperback version. Maybe.

Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=jfk+assassination&i=stripbooks&crid=12NKFMCQCF9XK&qid=1613320035&sprefix=jfk+ass%2Cstripbooks%2C159&ref=sr_pg_1



Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on February 14, 2021, 08:05:43 PM
Bugliosi reported 933 books "dealing exclusively with the assassination" as of 2006. Andy Winiarczyk of the Last Hurrah Book Shop told Bugliosi the 2000 figure was "too high." (Reclaiming History Endnotes, pp. 2-3)

Nice little factoid there. This is why I think Bugliosis book is important even if you don't agree with his conclusions. He went out and did little snippets of research like this to set the record straight. There are many conspiracy books that repeat the 2000 books claim and of course cite no source. They are just copying what someone else said.

Its surprising that someone as professional as Ann Goodpasture would repeat an unsubstantiated claim (i.e. of the 2000 books).
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: W. Tracy Parnell on February 14, 2021, 09:10:46 PM
Nice little factoid there. This is why I think Bugliosis book is important even if you don't agree with his conclusions. He went out and did little snippets of research like this to set the record straight. There are many conspiracy books that repeat the 2000 books claim and of course cite no source. They are just copying what someone else said.

Its surprising that someone as professional as Ann Goodpasture would repeat an unsubstantiated claim (i.e. of the 2000 books).

Yes, I agree that his book is a must have. To be clear, Bugliosi's sources (Sawa and Vasbinder who taught a course on the assassination at the University of Pittsburgh) did say that there were 2000 books that "had chapters on the assassination" as opposed to being exclusively about it.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on February 14, 2021, 09:23:40 PM
Yes, I agree that his book is a must have. To be clear, Bugliosi's sources (Sawa and Vasbinder who taught a course on the assassination at the University of Pittsburgh) did say that there were 2000 books that "had chapters on the assassination" as opposed to being exclusively about it.

I think even if a book has one chapter on the JFK assassination it might still be considered a JFK assassination book. For example, Richard Helms autobiography only has one chapter on the assassination. But I think his autobiography should be considered a "JFK assassination book" as there has been so much suspicion about him. 
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Bill Chapman on February 14, 2021, 10:39:59 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/vBDvK832/joke-library-jfk.jpg)
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on March 04, 2021, 09:02:17 PM
Quote
The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Count how many threads/posts have been placed just in this forum in the past two years and then it wouldn't surprise me.
There are a couple of other forums or so that might even help surpass that.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Walt Cakebread on March 06, 2021, 09:03:13 PM
If the definition is "in relation to the assassination" then I would guess the thousands figure is likely true. Or close. That's kind of a vague definition though. Does a book on JFK's life - the Robert Dallek book for example which discusses the assassination - apply? How about a book on RFK that talks about his reaction to the assassination? What about Robert Caro's book on LBJ? He discusses the assassination and how LBJ reacted to it.

But I don't think that's what we are talking about. I would think books "only about the assassination" - English only? - are 1000 or so. But I would also guess (lotta' guessing here) that many or most were self-published or issued by small publishers and not major companies.

Amazon books has more than 50 pages with 35 books on each page under the search "JFK assassination." Some are directly about it; others less so. One is about how JFK was killed to prevent him from revealing the alien presence around us. No thanks, I'll wait for the paperback version. Maybe.

Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=jfk+assassination&i=stripbooks&crid=12NKFMCQCF9XK&qid=1613320035&sprefix=jfk+ass%2Cstripbooks%2C159&ref=sr_pg_1

!750 books listed at Amazon....And that includes some that are pure rubbish.   So the number 1000 is probably roughly correct.

However IMO....  There are probably less than fifty books that are realistic and credible....And The Warren report is NOT one of the fifty.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Walt Cakebread on March 06, 2021, 09:11:03 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/vBDvK832/joke-library-jfk.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/vBDvK832/joke-library-jfk.jpg)

The Librarian didn't finish....Try over in fiction ....Under the subheading " Books sponsored by the US Government."
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on March 11, 2021, 09:01:07 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/vBDvK832/joke-library-jfk.jpg)
Well said as usual.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on March 11, 2021, 09:08:28 PM
Amazon...has 50 pages with 35 books on each page under the search "JFK assassination." Some are directly about it; others less so. One is about how JFK was killed to prevent him from revealing the alien presence around us.
Probably makes more sense than the Warren Report.   
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Mark A. Oblazney on March 13, 2021, 12:18:14 PM
Well said as usual.

So where is the 'faction' section?
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on March 23, 2021, 03:54:58 PM
Here's an interesting google "n-gram" of how often the phrase "JFK assassination" has appeared in their database of books from 1963-2019. The 1995 spike must have been related to the Stone movie "JFK." But a cause for the latter spike around 2012 or so is a mystery to me.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/SIluQQ-Psfwe_Q3A-KqBGeKd79-8i1uc-Y2lMsvJtmKy8IQ2Oud6m04-cXVV0nB8OnNoqpf8WyPzpp_VfCg4o3CDe37BeWruiU7E8908eXO9XFvXwjwQzMOoaP-BdVAgZ2xj5M2yLNEBGia59cwE5oJZP6Nuww-RW7Ild7I44wGEqZsH2xjPD7gjnGo_6b3X3iQN7AoUrl2e7GCR0B0UESW8vmyS3PgdkCh6QUGYUNnfNOOniQSIooWO4862pUaS0aZdQV4sKFFsmwzVYpke2LaHdF7biDSiy-UpM6iydoXcvor6AW_DkqFiq-zpFvFbfIJvsfT3mwMqg3AMYWpqsNPuWF6ZdefYgjVSmVfNrTE0nkjOs9mtUaXVIratUYjt-xv0bwuFfiUUHGs7-tYnCV_xGAVop9kzYGGO3pUUcLKMgJT2H0-rmV-H-py0ix5F3CyVobyZowqhUYAxdfxrQ-6WJjYbHQFEugv-LtRVaAgbPtruDvdq5qSMCjIzoiDIgQ6yWpHmTjBwsmm7szCLE76dqmAyxGtVOIGOp6f__PptDUs_Z5DdYFK6I042sLMzQhdwxnEZyOYMssEGf_XS7a5XQn0YRMRIfLeWVl7Q_3MilDjpiL-iR2KCpcQo5OToZwZ3sr5Ua8FBms80Dlj94TfVKT6cnq5vpmLgOhk8JzUiOqrgQtydYtutPF4LsUMZgFC3NVbhN2Sb3QLGlfvXSewN=w1168-h418-no?authuser=0)
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on March 24, 2021, 09:49:19 PM
Is there a particular reason for the large minus signs in some of these posts? 
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: John Iacoletti on March 24, 2021, 09:58:31 PM
Bad link.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on March 24, 2021, 10:04:42 PM
Bad link.
Well, I kind of thought so.
 Now I don't want to mention any names but Marjan Rynkiewicz has pages full of these negativos or did we notice?
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: James Chaney on April 02, 2021, 06:30:40 PM
A library full of books on a single topic is worthless if they're based upon false theses.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on April 09, 2021, 01:21:09 PM
A library full of books on a single topic is worthless if they're based upon false theses.

Of if they are left unread. I must say i've bought JFK books that i have not yet got around to reading. Reclaiming History is one such book. One of these days though.
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Frederick Clements on April 10, 2021, 10:23:56 AM
Most of these books are likely no longer in print.


Fred
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on June 01, 2021, 02:30:44 AM
Any idea how many books have been written on 9/11?

Isn't is strange it seems more books have been written about JFKs assassination than 9/11?
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Anthony Frank on June 03, 2021, 12:01:45 AM
Any idea how many books have been written on 9/11?

Isn't is strange it seems more books have been written about JFKs assassination than 9/11?

8 of the 15 of the chapters of my book deal with the JFK assassination, but there are 2 narrative chapters in which I explain who inside the CIA built the al Qaeda hierarchy and how they facilitated the 9/11 attacks. People are shocked to read what I know about the CIA’s connection to 9/11.

155 Five Star Ratings under Verified Purchases

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Gerry Down on June 03, 2021, 01:07:07 AM
155 Five Star Ratings under Verified Purchases

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

That's impressive  Thumb1:
Title: Re: The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Post by: Jerry Freeman on June 05, 2021, 06:31:01 AM
Quote
The 2000 books claim - is it true?
Compile a book listing all the books.