JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Gerry Down on September 17, 2021, 06:59:22 AM
-
This guy must really want to go back to jail.
-
It's good he reassures us that book sales are doing well.
-
This guy must really want to go back to jail.
Finally a voice of truth to power. Epik.
-
Can anyone post examples of LN or CT book authors admitting they published misleading or inaccurate
claim(s), presenting correcting details, and leaving it at that, with no tortured, face saving minimization of their original, inaccurate claim?
"The CT Community" punishes and shuns those who expose inaccuracies of their "favorite sons"...
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19016-albarellis-a-secret-order/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-274740
Hank Albarelli - May 29, 2013
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51486089136_b40bcd734b_b.jpg)
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20259-the-future-of-the-jfk-forum/page/9/
June 17, 2013
John Simkin
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51485368762_0552f405a4_b.jpg)
CTs dispute each other's published claims. Are there examples of LNs disputing published claims of other LNs?
-
Bugliosi corrects Posner a few times in reclaiming history and calls him out by name. Not sure if there was a bit of needle between those two or if bugliosi was just simply trying to set the record straight on things.
-
Bugliosi corrects Posner a few times in reclaiming history and calls him out by name. Not sure if there was a bit of needle between those two or if bugliosi was just simply trying to set the record straight on things.
Well, more than corrects him - he very strongly criticizes him. Not just in the book but in interviews too.
As to LN "lockstep" thinking: There's disagreement among the lone assassin believers on among other items: the timing of the first shot (and what happened to the bullet), whether Tague was hit by a piece of that shot or a piece of the skull after the third shot, the Odio incident, where the head shot entered JFK's skull (near the cowlick or lower down), and most important Oswald's motives. People like Max Holland say Oswald's act has to be placed in a Cold War perspective; that Oswald retaliated for JFK's anti-Castro policies. Others say he acted out of pure self interest, of a desire for notoriety and politics weren't involved.
Other than that (and I left some out) the "lockstep" characterization is spot on.
-
If you want to murder the world's most famous movie star and assassinate the president you want a Jim Files type of guy.
-
Can anyone post examples of LN or CT book authors admitting they published misleading or inaccurate
claim(s), presenting correcting details, and leaving it at that, with no tortured, face saving minimization of their original, inaccurate claim?
"The CT Community" punishes and shuns those who expose inaccuracies of their "favorite sons"...
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19016-albarellis-a-secret-order/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-274740
Hank Albarelli - May 29, 2013
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51486089136_b40bcd734b_b.jpg)
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20259-the-future-of-the-jfk-forum/page/9/
June 17, 2013
John Simkin
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51485368762_0552f405a4_b.jpg)
CTs dispute each other's published claims. Are there examples of LNs disputing published claims of other LNs?
File this under bewildered, betrayed. Sharp Shooting, Leslie?