JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Duncan MacRae on November 24, 2023, 09:12:23 AM

Title: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: Duncan MacRae on November 24, 2023, 09:12:23 AM
(https://img.newspapers.com/img/img?user=10766&id=374790272&clippingId=23469458&width=820&height=1192&crop=0_0_5602_8149&rotation=0)
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Mytton on November 25, 2023, 11:35:11 PM
(https://img.newspapers.com/img/img?user=10766&id=374790272&clippingId=23469458&width=820&height=1192&crop=0_0_5602_8149&rotation=0)

Thanks Duncan, so not only was the palmprint and it's location on the rifle known about well before a week later, it was front page news on the following Monday!

Oops. LOL!

A partial palm print that nobody knew about that just shows up a week later on an index card is evidence of framing.

JohnM
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: Zeon Mason on November 27, 2023, 10:29:25 PM
Oswald was out front of TSBD on the entrance landing in the west corner.
He’s the Prayerman drinking the white label Dr.Pepper  which was left at the lower step he was standing on thus making his 5’9” height appear only 5’2” relative to the 6’1” Buell W. Frazier.

The timeline starts from the 12:25 location of Oswald in the Domino room and because of FBI Hosty and Caroline Arnold, the late 12:29 arrival is Oswald to the outside landing and in position of PM, unnoticed , is entirely possible.

PM is NOT  300lb 5’5 “ Sarah Stanton
PM is NOT Pauline Sanders because she was over at the EAST side of the landing and right in the path of Baker running up the EAST side of the steps , which the primary reason Pauline Sanders saw Baker while seems to have missed seeing him.

No other person has come forward to positively ID themselves or a relative or friend they knew, as being PM.

The reason Oswald did not shout out nor some to wife, mother or brother ,  that he was on the steps at time of shooting , could plausibly be that Oswald thought he needed a reliable attorney before he divulged such info, lest the authority’s might destroy photo /film or alter photo or film.

Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: Richard Smith on November 28, 2023, 04:29:01 PM
Oswald was out front of TSBD on the entrance landing in the west corner.
He’s the Prayerman drinking the white label Dr.Pepper  which was left at the lower step he was standing on thus making his 5’9” height appear only 5’2” relative to the 6’1” Buell W. Frazier.

The timeline starts from the 12:25 location of Oswald in the Domino room and because of FBI Hosty and Caroline Arnold, the late 12:29 arrival is Oswald to the outside landing and in position of PM, unnoticed , is entirely possible.

PM is NOT  300lb 5’5 “ Sarah Stanton
PM is NOT Pauline Sanders because she was over at the EAST side of the landing and right in the path of Baker running up the EAST side of the steps , which the primary reason Pauline Sanders saw Baker while seems to have missed seeing him.

No other person has come forward to positively ID themselves or a relative or friend they knew, as being PM.

The reason Oswald did not shout out nor some to wife, mother or brother ,  that he was on the steps at time of shooting , could plausibly be that Oswald thought he needed a reliable attorney before he divulged such info, lest the authority’s might destroy photo /film or alter photo or film.

That is silly.  How would Oswald even be aware of such a film or photo at the time?  The obvious thing to do was indicate which of his coworkers could confirm his alibi.  There would be no conceivable reason for Oswald to conceal this information had it been true (which it is not).  He himself told reporters that he was in the building.  All he would have to say is "I was standing with X, Y, Z at the time the shots were fired."  X, Y, and Z would then be questioned to confirm. 
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Iacoletti on November 29, 2023, 05:38:19 AM
People who would cheer vigilante retribution for somebody they can’t prove is guilty are truly sociopaths.

By the way, “Mytton”, way to mine a 4 1/2-year-old quote. Except I didn’t say that nobody knew about it for a week. Oops!
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Mytton on November 29, 2023, 06:16:52 AM
Except I didn’t say that nobody knew about it for a week. Oops!

Your words John, not mine! LOLOL!

(https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/backhand-index-pointing-down.png)
A partial palm print that nobody knew about that just shows up a week later on an index card is evidence of framing.

Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Iacoletti on November 29, 2023, 06:38:10 AM
Your words John, not mine! LOLOL!

Your lack of reading comprehension, not mine.
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Mytton on November 29, 2023, 07:00:10 AM
Your lack of reading comprehension, not mine.

LOL!

(https://i.imgur.com/m4JC5mX.gif)

JohnM
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: Fergus O'Brien on November 29, 2023, 11:40:32 AM
"Thanks Duncan, so not only was the palmprint and it's location on the rifle known about well before a week later, it was front page news on the following Monday!

Oops. LOL!" john mytton

you seem to think that this mention of a print is new to us ? , is it new to you ? . that is mondays newspaper , henry wade told the press the evening before after oswalds death .OH BY THE WAY DID I TELL YOU WE FOUND A PRINT ON THE RIFLE ? is the sort of way that went . up to that point there was no mention of any print . so what you seem to think is new to us is not , and certainly does not prove oswald was up there in the window at 12.30 holding that rifle . i believe days description of the print was in essence that it was not a new fresh print .
Title: Re: What's good for the Goose? - 60 Years Ago Today
Post by: John Iacoletti on November 29, 2023, 09:05:09 PM
Nowhere in that quote “Mytton” dug up from 4 years ago do I say that nobody knew about the print for a week. I said that the print turned up a week later on an index card. Which it did. Keep trying though. LOL.

PS. How did a partial palmprint become “palm prints” for the newspaper? LOL again.

PPS: This article was published after the little visit to Oswald in the morgue, correct?