Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?  (Read 29335 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #136 on: September 25, 2018, 05:37:38 PM »
Advertisement
Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

A ring in a cup.  Coke, not Dr. Pepper.  Not chatty with a cab driver. Didn't read the newspaper that morning.  "prohibitive probability".

That's a mountain of rhetoric, not evidence.

 :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #136 on: September 25, 2018, 05:37:38 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #137 on: September 26, 2018, 03:08:53 AM »
It seems John Mytton is completely unable to show that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital.

This of course makes any discussion about possible planted evidence obsolete and a complete waste of time. 

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #138 on: September 26, 2018, 03:25:32 AM »
That wasn't the debate, can you prove CE399 was planted or not?

JohnM

The claim in 1964 was that CE 399 was found at PH. Now support that claim because the WC didn't.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #138 on: September 26, 2018, 03:25:32 AM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #139 on: September 26, 2018, 03:29:33 AM »
This is particularly startling and noteworthy when one stops to realize that those making the allegation of conspiracy necessarily have the burden of proof. I mean, it makes no sense for A to say to B, ?I allege that there is a conspiracy here. Now you prove there isn?t.? The alleger always, by definition, has the burden of proof.
RHVB


JohnM

And yet, you can claim that LHO did it alone without supporting it in the least. That is some double standard you have there.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #139 on: September 26, 2018, 03:29:33 AM »