http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2022/01/morley-and-jfk-revisited.html
Morley has turned completely reckless with these pieces now; he's relying on the public's ignorance of these complex matters to lead them to believe there's more than there was.
On the post-assassination story about Oswald re the DRE: As he himself admits elsewhere, the DRE members who released the story shortly after the assassination mentioning Oswald's pro-Cuban views/activities did so on their own and
without approval of Joannides. After Joannides ordered them to stop they did so. So claiming that the DRE was funded by the CIA (true) and not including the fact that the CIA did not approve the release of the story is grossly misleading. The DRE may have been funded through the CIA but that doesn't mean the CIA authorized or approved everything they did. These anti-Castro groups were notoriously uncontrollable. An uninformed reader would be misled into thinking so.
And he makes a great deal of his belief that Angleton should have informed the Secret Service about the threat that Oswald (somehow) posed to JFK. This was based on the Mexico City meeting at the Soviet Embassy with Kostikov. But the FBI knew about this too and didn't inform the SS. Morley is clearly trying to suggest more here; that is, the reason Angleton didn't inform the SS of the "threat" was because he was going to frame Oswald for the assassination. If he informs the SS of the potential threat from Oswald then it endangers the ability to frame Oswald.
He really is taking small tidbits here and there and trying to make something more than they are. It's very similar to John Newman's work.
