So, here is some of what Robert Frazier testified regarding the issues that they found with zeroing the scope at 100-yards:
Mr. EISENBERG - Mr. Frazier, could you tell us why, in your opinion, all the shots, virtually all the shots, are grouped high and to the right of the aiming point?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir. When we attempted to sight in this rifle at Quantico, we found that the elevation adjustment in the telescopic sight was not sufficient to bring the point of impact to the aiming point. In attempting to adjust and sight-in the rifle, every time we changed the adjusting screws to move the crosshairs in the telescopic sight in one direction-it also affected the movement of the impact or the point of impact in the other direction. That is, if we moved the crosshairs in the telescope to the left it would also affect the elevation setting of the telescope. And when we had sighted-in the rifle approximately, we fired several shots and found that the shots were not all landing in the same place, but were gradually moving away from the point of impact. This was apparently due to the construction of the telescope, which apparently did not stabilize itself--that is, the spring mounting in the crosshair ring did not stabilize until we had fired five or six shots.
I submit that it is possible that LHO thought that he had the scope zeroed in at his estimated distance for the shot at Walker. But that since that distance appears to be about 35-yards; and since this also equates to close to the same as zeroing it at 100-yards, that the spring mounting in the crosshairs ring might not have been stabilized yet. And therefore, that when the next shot that LHO apparently took(the one at Walker) the unstable crosshairs ring could have moved. The result being a shot that missed high and to the right and hit the window frame.