Thanks for sharing that link John. Certainly it could carry some weight if the conversation was recorded and you could catch James File lying about his twin brother and we could hear and see it for ourselves. Unfortunately it is a game of he said, she said. Is their any proof or could this just be fabricated in order to negate the credibility of whatever he said on camera in his interviews? Even phone records (in sarcasm). "I was the operator and I heard James Files make a phone call, person to person, he wasn't in Dallas!!! I wrote it on a piece of paper. He was in a house on such and such a street - never in Dallas!" Much easier now to track someone via a cellphone. Back then? I own a landline in a house and that definitely means I was babysitting that phone and so I know where you are!
There are certainly well used techniques such as was used more recently against Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh by his accusers. Accuse him of sexual impropriety 40 years ago and never having any real proof of its credibility. Hiring people to ruin another is an old game and well used.
Nonetheless, it is worth reading that entire article. But it is pure conjecture and speculation as we have no proof either way. We can pick on anything in that posting and question its credibility. One man says the fireball kicked like a mule and you can't see anything through the scope while firing it and yet another says that isn't true. Certain people even went so far as admitting Files owned a fireball but said the serial number was from a later date and was impossible to have been used at the time of the assassination. That sure is proof too! He said, she said! If you make bold statements like that, maybe it should be footnoted and proven to be credible before stating. Perhaps, you might be able to suggest that if you were an assassin, you may have owned a lot of weapons of various sorts over your career and more than just one of the same kind. You may even have a pattern of ditching them and certainly you wouldn't want them to be traceable back to you and have them registered.
Here is another prime example of suggestion:
John Stockwell says:
In 1955 Sam Giancana took over the Mafia family from Tony Accardo. In 1959 he was one of the most powerful crime figures in America - hardly one of the underlings.... one of the top lieutenants....
Contrast that with Wikipedia on Tony Accardo:
After 1957, Accardo turned over the official position as boss to Giancana because of "heat" from the IRS.[9] Accardo then became the Outfit's consigliere, stepping away from the day-to-day running of the organization, but he still retained considerable power and demanded ultimate respect. Giancana still had to obtain the sanction of Accardo and Ricca on major business, including murders.
Note: Accordo lived to the ripe old age of 86 and died in 1992. Those people appear to be reporting from a position of authority and confident surety of who was in authority and when. The fact is they are about as credible as I would be in saying that I saw Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew gangbanging an underage girl on Epstein's Lolita Express! We can all express our opinion about these matters - no one can prove anything without a doubt and as such is why a justice system exists with prosecutors and defence attorneys.
