Too many conspiracy theories - isn't this the problem?

[Zeon Mason]

Too many  coincidences beyond what is statistically probable compels the skeptic to question the orthodox narrative of an isolated incident theory.  Ie: Nothing to see here, it was simply an act by a single person completely independent of the various persons he had contact with preceding the event.

So although it’s not impossible that Oswald could be a lone kook who for whatever reason felt compelled to shoot JFK, the amazing variety of persons that Oswald had contact with , characters like Jack Ruby and George DeMorenshield, or Guy Bannister, or in a photo with identifiable Alpha 66 BOP operatives, makes it extremely difficult  to accept Oswald was just an isolated nut.

[Allan Fritzke]

This is how CTers get enlightenment.  Watching movies!!! 

[Tom Mahon]

Isn't the problem with JFKA research that there are just too many conspiracy theories?

I don't suppose the world-class humanitarian organization formerly known as the KGB* had, or still has, anything to do with the creation and/or promulgation of oodles and gobs of nation-rending JFKA CTs over the past sixty-one years.

(Sarcasm.)

*Today's SVR and FSB

[John Iacoletti]

The CTer "mind" can rarely entertain the concept of a single narrative.  Those that do are easily exposed as the most deranged (body alterations, faked JFK death, SS agent accidental shooting).  As a result, there often is no specific theory much less any agreed upon theory.

Marching in lockstep around a made-up and mythological narrative like religious zealots is not a virtue.