Here's An Interesting Document

[Thomas Graves]

If the referenced conversation was between Ruth and Michael, could it be that they were KGB agents, and that they knew Oswald had been programmed in the USSR?

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57756#relPageId=51&tab=page

--  MWT 

[Charles Collins]

If the referenced conversation was between Ruth and Michael, could it be that they were KGB agents, and that they knew Oswald had been programmed in the USSR?

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57756#relPageId=51&tab=page

--  MWT 

Do we know who’s telephone numbers are in that document?

[Thomas Graves]

Do we know who’s telephone numbers are in that document?

Dear Charles,

I personally don't know (I'm too lazy to call the pertinent reference librarians, etc), but other documents associated with this one on the Internet make it clear that the Arlington one must be Michael's (work phone number?), and the one in Irving must be Ruthie's.

What are your thoughts:

1)  If they are Michael's and Ruth's respective phone numbers?

2)  If one of them is, for example, David Atlee Phillips' phone number?

3) If one of them is, for example, Carlos Marcello's phone number?

4)  If one of them is, for example, long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt's phone number?

5)  [fill in the blank]?


Are you hoping that they aren't Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

Do you seriously doubt they are Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

If so, why?

(Just curious)

--  MWT 

[Charles Collins]

Dear Charles,

I personally don't know (I'm too lazy to call the pertinent reference librarians, etc), but other documents associated with this one on the Internet make it clear that the Arlington one must be Michael's (work phone number?), and the one in Irving must be Ruthie's.

What are your thoughts:

1)  If they are Michael's and Ruth's respective phone numbers?

2)  If one of them is, for example, David Atlee Phillips' phone number?

3) If one of them is, for example, Carlos Marcello's phone number?

4)  If one of them is, for example, long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt's phone number?

5)  [fill in the blank]?


Are you hoping that they aren't Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

Do you seriously doubt they are Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

If so, why?

(Just curious)

--  MWT 

There’s not enough information in the document to make a judgment. But it does appear to be intriguing...

[Thomas Graves]

There’s not enough information in the document to make a judgment. But it does appear to be intriguing...

I just now found this interesting section in Bugliosi's book.

So, maybe neither Michael nor Ruth were "nash"

, or were they, hmm? ...

... but, as Bugliosi makes pretty clear, neither is this document necessarily evidence of an evil, evil, evil FBI coverup, doggone it.

https://books.google.com/books?id=q1VJAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT1799&lpg=PT1799&dq=%22we+both+know+who+is+responsible%22&source=bl&ots=6BV2P0PApc&sig=ACfU3U1nqrUHJwQg4EwoKksDjiSdw60TtQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiv2dHZtIHqAhV4JzQIHeoGBAMQ6AEwAXoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22we%20both%20know%20who%20is%20responsible%22&f=false

[Martin Weidmann]

Dear Charles,

I personally don't know (I'm too lazy to call the pertinent reference librarians, etc), but other documents associated with this one on the Internet make it clear that the Arlington one must be Michael's (work phone number?), and the one in Irving must be Ruthie's.

What are your thoughts:

1)  If they are Michael's and Ruth's respective phone numbers?

2)  If one of them is, for example, David Atlee Phillips' phone number?

3) If one of them is, for example, Carlos Marcello's phone number?

4)  If one of them is, for example, long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt's phone number?

5)  [fill in the blank]?


Are you hoping that they aren't Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

Do you seriously doubt they are Mike and Ruthie's phone numbers?

If so, why?

(Just curious)

--  MWT 

There's not enough information in the document to make a judgment. But it does appear to be intriguing...

Perhaps you guys should read the next couple of pages on the Mary Ferrell website.... They show FBI 302 reports on the same subject.

[Thomas Graves]

Perhaps you guys should read the next couple of pages on the Mary Ferrell website.... They show FBI 302 reports on the same subject.

Dear Marty,

Hmm

--  MWT