Name your shooter

[Richard Smith]

Names of shooters is irrelevant absolutely irrelevant, professional assassins take on jobs through contacts, middle men, the shooters would have no idea who even hired them ( Marcello AND Trafficante imo) the real question should be how come the 18 odd suspicious deaths following the 3 years after 1963 have odds of like 167 trillion to 1 lol, not including the spikes during the HSCA hearings, but they everyone who met their fate were simply unlucky eh ? 

The name of the person who assassinated President Kennedy is not relevant?  Unreal.  Talk about an implicit concession of weakness from Oswald defenders. 

[Bill Chapman]

Names of shooters is irrelevant absolutely irrelevant, professional assassins take on jobs through contacts, middle men, the shooters would have no idea who even hired them ( Marcello AND Trafficante imo) the real question should be how come the 18 odd suspicious deaths following the 3 years after 1963 have odds of like 167 trillion to 1 lol, not including the spikes during the HSCA hearings, but they everyone who met their fate were simply unlucky eh ? 

I read somewhere that those wild death odds were a typo and the publication apologized for it. Cause-of-death studies averaged out between the genpop and the supposed 'disappeared'. I read that too.

Mystery Deaths?
https://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/deaths.htm

[John Iacoletti]

Same old song and dance for 58 years: prove that somebody else did it or else Oswald wins by default.