Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up  (Read 3533 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« on: December 21, 2021, 01:11:42 AM »
Advertisement

JFK Assassination Forum

The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« on: December 21, 2021, 01:11:42 AM »


Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2021, 10:09:01 PM »
Thnaks. Some interesting points in that report.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2021, 12:29:28 AM »



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2021, 12:29:28 AM »


Offline Robert Reeves

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2021, 03:03:36 AM »
All true

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2021, 07:57:25 PM »
Quote
Fabian Escalante joined the Department of State Security in 1959. Escalante was head of a counter-intelligence unit and also part of a team investigating a CIA operation called Sentinels of Liberty, an attempt to recruit Cubans willing to work against Castro. At the request of the U.S., he presented the HSCA with a report on Cuban findings about the JFK assassination that was never published by the committee because of some of the information it contained. He is recognized as a leading authority on the CIA in Cuba and Latin America.
Some of his critics state that he seems to base most of his analysis on the work of American researchers and that he is biased. In his defense, it is important to note that very few American investigators have gone through as much committee-based research as Escalante. While it is true that some of his sources like Tosh Plumlee and Chuck Giancana are not convincing for many, he himself tempers his observations by often emphasizing that more research should be done to follow-up on leads ignored by U.S. media and intelligence. His exchanges with people like Dick Russell and Gaeton Fonzi helped push the analysis forward. As we will see, some of his insights certainly go an awful lot farther than what we can see on CNN. In the following sections, we will look at Escalante’s work, which will be at times bolstered by findings from other sources that dovetail with his analysis.

Cuban intelligence, though lacking in structure during the days that followed the revolution, had privileged access to informants in the U.S. and Cuba who at times penetrated exile groups in the U.S. and their antennas on the Island. They also captured combatants who revealed secrets they kept about the assassination. Furthermore, they were able to obtain information from their Russian counterparts. Finally, they kept abreast of all U.S. research in the subject to a degree far superior to what historians or mainstream media ever did. By 1965, a Cuban spy, Juan Felaifel Canahan, had infiltrated CIA special missions groups in Miami and won Cuban exile leader Manuel Artime’s confidence. Artime was involved in the plot to assassinate Castro code-named AMLASH, which brought together the CIA, Mafia, and Cuban exiles in the master plan. It was only after 1975, after the publication of a Church Committee report, that they suspected that this partnership was behind the assassination of JFK.

In 1993, during his retirement, after launching a security studies center, he again put together all the pieces of the puzzle he could put his hands on. His research would be enriched by ARRB releases. Even Escalante admits that he does not have full access to all the Cuban files, but what he does know is worth listening to.

In 1995 Wayne Smith, chief of the Centre for International Policy in Washington, arranged a meeting on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, in Nassau, Bahamas. Others in attendance were: Gaeton Fonzi, Dick Russell, Noel Twyman, Anthony Summers, Peter Dale Scott, John M. Newman, Jeremy Gunn, John Judge, Andy Kolis, Peter Kornbluh, Mary and Ray LaFontaine, Jim Lesar, Russ Swickard, Ed Sherry, and Gordon Winslow. In 2006, his book analyzing the assassination, JFK: The Cuba Files, was published. While some of Cuba’s sources are deemed contestable by some reputable researchers, it is clear that they had access to sources that not even the FBI could have tapped. Their findings may not be perfect but they certainly are more fact-based and up to date than anything a historian will find in the Warren Commission report.
In JFK: The Cuba Files, Escalante describes how the departure of Cuban exiles, CIA operators and Mafiosi from the Island, where they had originally joined forces, gave birth to what he called the CIA and Mafia’s “Cuban American Mechanism”. Its members were based mostly in Miami and were trained to do a lot of the dirty work to get their empire back in a manner that was plausibly deniable by their supervisors.

Most researchers are aware of the influence the business elite had on U.S. foreign policy. It is now fully accepted that regime change in the 1950s in the Middle East was for the benefit of U.S. and British oil magnates, and the removal of Arbenz in Guatemala was asked for by United Fruit and made good on by Dulles and a cadre of CIA officers who mastered the art of delivering a coup. Many of these specialists were involved in covert actions against Cuba and some became persons of interest in the JFK assassination.

Escalante demonstrates the importance of the corporate elite in dictating U.S. policy by quoting a statement made by Roy Robottom, Assistant Undersecretary of State for Hemispheric Affairs: “… In June 1959 we had taken the decision that it was not possible to achieve our objectives with Castro in power … In July and August, we had been drawing up a program to replace Castro. However, certain companies in the United States informed us during that period that they were achieving some progress in negotiations, a factor that led to a delay …” By the end of 1959, J.C. King, head of the CIA’s Western Hemisphere Division, recommended the assassination of Castro. In March 1960, Eisenhower approved the overthrow under a project codenamed Pluto.

The Mechanism assumed a life of its own after the failed Bay of Pigs in 1962, and held JFK responsible for the debacle.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2021, 07:57:25 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2022, 05:18:04 AM »




The KGB was / is in possession of data purporting to indicate the LBJ was responsible for the assassination of President John Kennedy.

Intelligent folks in foreign countries weren't blinded by the BS that the gullible Americans accepted.

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2022, 05:44:25 AM »
I don’t find this unusual at all. If
Khrushchev has been assassinated, no doubt the CIA would have been immediately concerned about the new USSR totalitarian commissar stepping into power and and the USA would probably high alert also.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2022, 04:24:09 AM »
The KGB was / is in possession of data purporting to indicate the LBJ was responsible for the assassination of President John Kennedy.

Intelligent folks in foreign countries weren't blinded by the BS that the gullible Americans accepted.

You're accusing LBJ of being responsible for JFK's assassination?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The smoking gun document of CIA cover-up
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2022, 04:24:09 AM »