It's a fact, the Hidell identification was in Oswald's wallet.
Slow down Cowboy, Oswald bought the rifle in March just before he attempted to murder General Walker and clearly Oswald used the Hidell alias to hide his true identity for that attempt. Oswald carrying the Hidell identification eight months later could have been for a multitude of reasons.
The rest was just gibberish and your usual insults, which btw are getting more aggressive as the years pass. Lighten up, there's more to life than being perpetually angry.
JohnM
It's a fact, the Hidell identification was in Oswald's wallet.Really? That must have come as a surprise to Paul Bentley who took the wallet from Oswald and never mentioned (not even is his report of 12/03/63) that it contained a Hidell ID.
Perhaps that's the reason they never asked him to testify... what do you think?
Oswald bought the rifle in March just before he attempted to murder General Walker and clearly Oswald used the Hidell alias to hide his true identity for that attempt. Really? Where is the proof that Oswald "bought the rifle"? And what is so "clear" about Oswald using the Hidell alias to hide his true identity? Are you sure you have got this the right way around?
Oswald allegedly ordered the rifle under the alias Hidell, so it wouldn't really make sense to use the Hidell alias "to hide his true identity" as that fake ID would tie him to the rifle in the same way it did in the Kennedy murder. You really need to think stuff like this through because you are not making any sense.
Oswald carrying the Hidell identification eight months later could have been for a multitude of reasons.Really? You just can't name one, right?
