Why Didn't the Soviets and Cubans Expose the Alleged Fake Oswald Visits?

[Dan O'meara]

So many excuses.  Here are your exact words:  "Of the hundreds of tall buildings JFK passed during his many motorcades it was from one owned by a good friend of LBJ's that the assassin killed JFK."  "It" [the TSBD] was the "one" owned by a friend of LBJ in your silly claim.  What exactly does this mean if you are not indicating there was something unique and singular about the TSBD? Again, "it" was the "one" building passed that was allegedly owned by a "friend" of LBJ.  You have clearly stated that the TSBD was the "one" or only building passed that was allegedly owned by a "friend."  That is what renders your baseless claim as having any relevance.  If you are now acknowledging that JFK passed many other such buildings owned by "friends" of LBJ, your point has even less relevance than before.  Which was none.

So many excuses.

There isn't a single excuse in anything I posted.
Your understanding of the English language is questionable to say the least.
Not understanding the language you are using is a sure indicator of a questionable intelligence.

I know what my exact words are. I posted them. I posted them again to demonstrate that you were talking sh^t, as usual.
It's amusing that you have decided to post them yet again, demonstrating your tenuous grasp of the English language.
I'll make it simple for you - I said it was a coincidence that the building LBJ was shot from was owned by a friend of his. You said that I said this was the "only" building JFK passed by that was owned by a friend of LBJ's.
I said nothing of the sort. You are either lying or just stupid.
I pointed out that you were wrong and why you were wrong.
Instead of accepting your mistake with good grace you come up with this mental post insisting you were somehow right!!

JFK was shot from a building owned by a friend of LBJ.
You call this a "baseless claim" (note the correct use of quotation marks referencing something you actually posted. Do you understand how that works yet?). In an earlier post you refer to this coincidence as a "dubious premise".
Do you understand what you mean when you post things like "baseless claim" or "dubious premise"? These phrases do not apply to what I've posted.
Do you understand that?

I imagine that, in a murder investigation, it would be of immense interest that the man who benefitted the most from JFK's death (LBJ) awarded his first multi-million dollar defence contract to the man who owned the building JFK was shot from!
You don't think that's interesting because you don't think. You are told what to think by the Warren Commission. So you don't have to think for yourself.

[Richard Smith]

So many excuses.

There isn't a single excuse in anything I posted.
Your understanding of the English language is questionable to say the least.
Not understanding the language you are using is a sure indicator of a questionable intelligence.

I know what my exact words are. I posted them. I posted them again to demonstrate that you were talking sh^t, as usual.
It's amusing that you have decided to post them yet again, demonstrating your tenuous grasp of the English language.
I'll make it simple for you - I said it was a coincidence that the building LBJ was shot from was owned by a friend of his. You said that I said this was the "only" building JFK passed by that was owned by a friend of LBJ's.
I said nothing of the sort. You are either lying or just stupid.
I pointed out that you were wrong and why you were wrong.
Instead of accepting your mistake with good grace you come up with this mental post insisting you were somehow right!!

JFK was shot from a building owned by a friend of LBJ.
You call this a "baseless claim" (note the correct use of quotation marks referencing something you actually posted. Do you understand how that works yet?). In an earlier post you refer to this coincidence as a "dubious premise".
Do you understand what you mean when you post things like "baseless claim" or "dubious premise"? These phrases do not apply to what I've posted.
Do you understand that?

I imagine that, in a murder investigation, it would be of immense interest that the man who benefitted the most from JFK's death (LBJ) awarded his first multi-million dollar defence contract to the man who owned the building JFK was shot from!
You don't think that's interesting because you don't think. You are told what to think by the Warren Commission. So you don't have to think for yourself.

So many words and another juvenile tantrum/lecture.  Here is exactly what you said to suggest there was a possible connection between the shots coming from the TSBD and LBJ:  "Of the hundreds of tall buildings JFK passed during his many motorcades it was from one owned by a good friend of LBJ's[/b] that the assassin killed JFK." 

Putting aside that your statement is baseless, it is clearly intended to suggest that the TSBD was different from the other buildings along the motorcade because it was owned by a "friend" of LBJ and that uniqueness has some potential significance.  If you are now backtracking to acknowledge that it was not the only such building owned by a friend along the route and that other such buildings were also owned by LBJ friends/associates, then your original statement is completely pointless.  There would be nothing unique about this.  LBJ was a lifelong Texas politician.  He probably has some relationship with just about every wealthy person in the state including many of those who owned buildings along the route.  Big deal.