Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lame LN excuses  (Read 74521 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #160 on: April 14, 2022, 11:21:19 PM »
Advertisement
The first day affidavit's are very similar, are you suggesting that they couldn't get their stories straight?
Btw both women Positively Identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man they saw! Thumb1:

Unfair, biased lineups are unreliable.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #160 on: April 14, 2022, 11:21:19 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #161 on: April 14, 2022, 11:21:57 PM »
In '63, Whaley described what his infamous passenger was wearing and he made no mention of any jacket.  He even described, in detail, Oswald's shirt.

Take it or leave it, them's the facts.

Who knows why Whaley described one thing in '63 and then something different in his testimony in '64, but at least now you'll hopefully stop stating as a fact that Oswald was wearing two jackets in the cab.

Lose your pissy attitude and read the FBI reports.

FBI reports are secondhand information.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #162 on: April 14, 2022, 11:26:57 PM »
Does characterizing the jacket found as white preclude it from being the one placed in evidence or not?  Walt has suggested that because the jacket was described as "white" it cannot be the same one in evidence,  Do you agree or not?  In my opinion, that jacket could be reasonably described as white, gray, or even tan depending on the light or shade.

Regardless of what color you call it, what is this jacket evidence of, exactly?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #162 on: April 14, 2022, 11:26:57 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #163 on: April 14, 2022, 11:30:45 PM »
Btw if there was any collusion and a possible conspiracy, or whatever paranoid delusion you're having today, with the Davis girls then surely wouldn't they have all the important details be exactly the same, the fact that there is so many consistencies in their stories but with small expected discrepancies speaks highly of their authenticity.

"important details".  LOL.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #164 on: April 14, 2022, 11:36:30 PM »
Saint Lee of the Oswalds.

When they resort to this kind of rhetoric, well, you know they've lost the argument.  They know it, too... or they wouldn't make such lame comments.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #164 on: April 14, 2022, 11:36:30 PM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #165 on: April 14, 2022, 11:39:33 PM »
I have no first hand knowledge of what they showed her.  They showed the blue jacket to Benavides.  Why?

This doesn't change the fact that you've already admitted that Marina was shown a jacket.  C'mon.  Own it.  You can do it.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #166 on: April 14, 2022, 11:42:22 PM »
The Whaley issue is really odd and goes nowhere, if Oswald used public transport to get the the rooming house that has absolutely no bearing on his guilt and the only real viable alternative is that Oswald had a getaway car which has a huge impact on his guilt.

"the only real viable alternative".  LOL.

Quote
And the Davis girls just happened to live a couple of doors down from a random killing but somehow they became involved within hours and they both had to quickly make up some story and because poor Virginia made a simple "typo" she is accused of being the spawn of Satan!

Embarrassingly transparent strawman.  The inconsistency of the Davis accounts merely means that you cannot rely on their accuracy.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #167 on: April 14, 2022, 11:44:33 PM »
FBI reports are secondhand information.

Whaley, in his affidavit, described the shirt Oswald was wearing, in detail.  Nothing about two jackets.  Whaley signed this.  So now what?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #167 on: April 14, 2022, 11:44:33 PM »