So are you now saying he had both the jacket and revolver on him all day?
No, I’m asking you how you know his got “his revolver and jacket” at the boarding house.
Why do evangelists always make up silly “so are you saying” strawman instead of just answering the question?
Exactly! Which is why I was asking you what proof, or even just a justifiable reason, you had to question that Oswald didn't go back to the boarding house to get the revolver?
Duh. Because there’s no evidence he got a revolver at the boarding house.
I didn't say you did make any of those claims. And the point was in the original post. I was highlighting that you don't have be a genius to apply unjustifiable questions or doubt to an occurrence that could actually be fact in the way that you constantly do
Surely you know the difference between a fact and something that could be a fact.