Lame LN excuses

[Mitch Todd]

Too bad there isn't a straight-line path entering JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and exiting the throat at C7. If there is then there isn't a LNer with guts to show us the trajectory using my 2 laser challenge. LNers is cheap, lazy bastages who are not interested in the truth. Prove me wrong, I DARE YOU! 

It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something, and measurements have some amount of uncertainty built in, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with your straight line shtick. Other than the rest of us shouldn't take you seriously.

[Martin Weidmann]

It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something, and measurements have some amount of uncertainty built in, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with your straight line shtick. Other than the rest of us shouldn't take you seriously.

bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something

What does that mean.... "hit something"?

Are you saying that a bullet going through a body without hitting anything other than soft tissue will not travel in a straight line?

[Bill Brown]

Lame John I. excuses:

1) Everyone lied or planted evidence if it implicates Oswald (repeat in every instance but then deny this is what you are doing).
2) Suggest that every explanation that addresses an insane CTer claim is a "strawman" argument (demonstrating either a traumatic childhood experience with The Wizard of Oz or a way to avoid acknowledging the lunacy of these claims without having to address the substance)
3)  Suggest all evidence is the product of an "opinion, "assumption," or "speculation." Fingerprints, hand writing, document, pictures - any inference drawn from this evidence is merely an opinion.  This limitation does not, however, apparently apply to any nutty counter-alternative to Oswald's guilt no matter how improbable or baseless.  If it is possible, then it can be entertained or implied so long as it lends itself to doubt about Oswald's guilt.

 

[John Iacoletti]

It's quite well known that bullets often do not travel in a straight line once they've hit something,

Then how do you know where the bullet(s) that wounded Connally originated from?

[John Iacoletti]

Way to chime in on a 2-year-old post, Brown!

[Martin Weidmann]

Way to chime in on a 2-year-old post, Brown!

Give him a break. He's a bit slow.

[Thomas Graves]

Way to chime in on a 2-year-old post, Brown!

Iacoletti,

Is that against the rules?

You "chimed in," too, didn't you?

[Mitch Todd]

Then how do you know where the bullet(s) that wounded Connally originated from?

From the position of the sounds themselves, you don't. At least not exactly. You can still suss out the general direction of the bullet's origin. Then it comes down to how many shooter locations you can find evidence for in that area.