What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

[Steve Howsley]

You sure are repetitive.

Almost 55 years later and you still can't demonstrate that your conclusion is true.  It must be so frustrating after all this time to have nothing besides a desperate attempt to shift the burden of proof over and over again to try to hide your repeated failures.  Why are you so arrogant to think that you are just automatically right by default?  You actually believe that it's better to have a "theory" that you can't justify than to just admit that you don't know.

55 years later with a large stack of conspiracy books to fall back on and you still haven't got the courage to argue for a theory. You have nothing. You simply bleat BS day after day. Here's an idea; stand up, be a man not a mouse; make a positive statement with an ounce of evidence as to how the assassination unfolded. I know why you won't; it's because you have nothing at all that will stand up to scrutiny. Zilch, zero, diddly, zippo is the sum of your conviction.

[John Iacoletti]

55 years later with a large stack of conspiracy books to fall back on and you still haven't got the courage to argue for a theory. You have nothing. You simply bleat BS day after day. Here's an idea; stand up, be a man not a mouse; make a positive statement with an ounce of evidence as to how the assassination unfolded. I know why you won't; it's because you have nothing at all that will stand up to scrutiny. Zilch, zero, diddly, zippo is the sum of your conviction.

"Courage" - LOL

It's called intellectual honesty.  Perhaps you should look into it.  You are not honest enough to admit that your BS doesn't stand up to scrutiny, so all you can do is deflect.  You have yet to provide an ounce of evidence for your own "manly" conviction.  All you can do is talk trash.  Why is that?

[Jake Maxwell]

Driver SS agent Bill Greer's rubbernecking to the back of the limousine until Kennedy is shot, and braking at the wall corner, but then giving a lame explanation of his braking, claiming he thought there might have been a flat tire

Hoover stating in a memo only hours after the assassination, how important it was to convince the public that Oswald killed the president

LBJ's mistress testifying that LBJ hated Kennedy, and suggesting LBJ attended a meeting prior to the assassination that was possibly a briefing of events about to happen

Orville Nix claiming that his film didn't look the same when it was returned from the FBI and other signs of film/photo tampering (Were there some on site assigned to document those who had cameras and film to confiscate?)

A higher than expected percentage of deaths among those who might have had insider info, as some researchers have suggested
and etc...

It could have been a very large group of conspirators, indeed... but no one knows how large...


SS agent, Bill Greer, looking back toward the president, until JFK is shot...

[Steve Howsley]

"Courage" - LOL

It's called intellectual honesty.  Perhaps you should look into it.  You are not honest enough to admit that your BS doesn't stand up to scrutiny, so all you can do is deflect.  You have yet to provide an ounce of evidence for your own "manly" conviction.  All you can do is talk trash.  Why is that?

Again you fail. You've got nothing as you have already admitted. What you do have is a truck load of sweet FA. Come on John, put something forward or admit that you refuse to even step onto the ground preferring instead to sit in the bleachers where you can pretend to know more than the coaches and claim that you could perform better than the players if only you weren't addicted to hot dogs.

Pathetic.

[John Iacoletti]

Again you fail. You've got nothing. Sweet FA. Come on John, put something forward or admit that you refuse to even step onto the ground preferring instead to sit in the bleachers where you can pretend to know more than the coaches and claim that you could perform better than the players if only you weren't addicted to hot dogs.

Pathetic.

You know what's really pathetic, Steve?  160 posts and no citation of a single piece of evidence to support your opinion.

Not

A

Single

Piece

You're either hopelessly ignorant about the case, or you're afraid to confront the house of cards your opinion is built upon.

So much for "being a man".

[Steve Howsley]

You know what's really pathetic, Steve?  160 posts and no citation of a single piece of evidence to support your opinion.

Not

A

Single

Piece

You're either hopelessly ignorant about the case, or you're afraid to confront the house of cards your opinion is built upon.

So much for "being a man".

I support the majority of the findings reached by two major commissions into the assassination where one  concluded that Oswald acted alone and the other where he was identified as a key player and the only doubt raised was a recording thought to be sounds from the plaza but was later found to be from the trade mart. The evidence collected supports Oswald's heavy involvement. I acknowledge that Oswald may have had encouragement or even some support but I think the likelihood of that is extremely remote (less than .001%) and will can never be proved 100% either way.

What is it that you believe again remembering of course your admission that you've got nothing?

[John Mytton]

SS agent, Bill Greer, looking back toward the president, until JFK is shot...

I don't know about you but I wouldn't knowingly drive into your triangulation of snipers for even a billion dollars, was Greer insane?



JohnM

[Jake Maxwell]

I don't know about you but I wouldn't knowingly drive into your triangulation of snipers for even a billion dollars, was Greer insane?



JohnM

I don?t think Greer was insane...
It is possible he was part of some conspiracy... braking at the corner of the wall... looking back as though he?s waiting until the dirty deed is done....