Four times Toni Foster said, "The car stopped!"

[Richard Rubio]

You are a fine poster Richard. I do note, that while not outright uncivil, it seems John I does have his share of negative words to label people with.

[Steve Logan]

So, if that's all you got then, as per usual, then check and mate, mate. 

by ,

[Bill Brown]

Sure, that's why he didn't notice suspect cross Patton in front of his cab.

100% irrelevant unless you're suggesting that William Scoggins really wasn't sitting in his cab parked on Patton.  Are you?

[Bill Brown]

John I. is the single most dishonest poster on this forum which is why I don't respond to his nonsense. My favorite example was when he posted a copy of Oswald's arrest report that was stamped "deceased" making clear that information was added to the report after 11.22.  When I noted that, he removed that report and posted an earlier version without the stamp and then repeatedly asked me where I saw the word "deceased" on the report.  It's one thing to be nut a job, and even worse to be a dishonest kook. It is all the more humorous that he takes himself so seriously after being humiliated so many times on this forum.  Like claiming Marina MUST have known who the VP was since she had lived in the US for a couple years and could not possibly have mistaken the VP as a reference to Nixon.  Apparently not realizing that Marina was asked this and confirmed she had never heard of LBJ before the assassination.  And his suggestion that Oswald somehow bought a movie ticket on the morning of 11.22 to explain how he enters the Texas Theater without doing so that afternoon.  Not realizing that the box office didn't open until after noon.  LOL.  He is a joke.

Well said, Richard.

[Bill Brown]

You're so transparent it almost hurts...

Mr. SCOGGINS. I noticed he stopped down there, and I wasn't paying too much attention to the man, you see, just used to see him every day, but then I kind of looked down the street, saw this, someone, that looked to me like he was going west, now, I couldn't exactly say whether he was going west or was in the process of turning around, but he was facing west when I saw him.

But didn't he just cross right in front of Scoggins going east?

Oh, he also missed Markham screaming her head off...

Mr. BELIN. You never actually saw her standing on the street, did you?
Mr. SCOGGINS. I never actually observed her there.

Blah blah blah

I noticed you did not respond to my question.  Are you suggesting that Scoggins was not there?

[Bill Brown]

I'm questioning when he was there.

If he was there how did he miss both the suspect crossing right in front of him and the only alleged witness to the shooting, screaming?

You only have one witness (Markham) claiming the suspect crossed Patton. One uncorroborated witness.

As expected, you couldn't deal with the quotes even though they came right out of the WC hearings.

Was Scoggins sitting in his cab on Patton at Tenth facing north when Tippit was shot?  This is a simple yes or no question.

[John Mytton]

You're a sick man Daffy. Seek advice. So you're backing about 6 or seven different kook theories and wrapping it up in what is now known as The Daffy Theory. Multiple shooters, sheep dipped, rabbit hole, films altered, SS compliance, coup d'?tat,    OMFG you are one of those all-star nuts. You're a scary dude. I hope we're tracking you offline too.

Hahaha "The Daffy Theory".

You're a scary dude.

 

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

John I. is the single most dishonest poster on this forum which is why I don't respond to his nonsense. My favorite example was when he posted a copy of Oswald's arrest report that was stamped "deceased" making clear that information was added to the report after 11.22.  When I noted that, he removed that report and posted an earlier version without the stamp and then repeatedly asked me where I saw the word "deceased" on the report.  It's one thing to be nut a job, and even worse to be a dishonest kook.

Patently false.  I proved it at the time by noting that the post in question had no timestamp showing that it had ever been modified.

"Richard" made the false argument that since somebody later stamped the arrest report "deceased", that was proof that the arrest report was written after Oswald was killed.  One look in the Dallas Police archives for the original arrest report shows that "Richard"'s argument was pure BS.  But instead of being accountable for his embarrassing mistake, he tries to deflect it on me.

Then there was that embarrassing time that "Richard" tried to claim that a power outage in the TSBD would have turned off the Hertz sign, even though it was not even connected to the building's power supply.  He tried to deflect that onto me too.

It is all the more humorous that he takes himself so seriously after being humiliated so many times on this forum.  Like claiming Marina MUST have known who the VP was since she had lived in the US for a couple years and could not possibly have mistaken the VP as a reference to Nixon.

Hoo boy.  Marina said that he said "Nixon".  Get over it.  Your silly argument is just a lame excuse.  There is no evidence for your contention that Oswald just said "the vice-president".  None.

And his suggestion that Oswald somehow bought a movie ticket on the morning of 11.22 to explain how he enters the Texas Theater without doing so that afternoon.  Not realizing that the box office didn't open until after noon.  LOL.  He is a joke.

Another "Richard" lie.  Julia Postal said she wasn't sure if he bought a ticket or not.  Again, get over it.  It doesn't matter when the box office opened.  Your claim that he definitely didn't buy a ticket is unsupported.  You're using your unfounded assumption that Oswald could only have bought a ticket when Brewer thought he entered the theater in order to support your equally unfounded assumption that he never bought a ticket.

If you have to repeatedly lie in order to make an argument that I'm dishonest, then what does that say about you?