What?s the best evidence of a second shooter?

[John Iacoletti]

All scientific analyses of the film show clear evidence of JBC being struck at Z224.

 

These "scientific" analyses amount to "looks like he's reacting to a bullet strike".  Other people make the exact same arguments about different frames.

[John Mytton]

These "scientific" analyses amount to "looks like he's reacting to a bullet strike".  Other people make the exact same arguments about different frames.

At the same time;
Kennedy violently reacts.
Connally violently reacts.
Connally's jacket violently reacts.

Both men's wounds line up and can be traced back to the floor with Oswald's rifle was, geez what are the chances?



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

At the same time;
Kennedy violently reacts.
Connally violently reacts.
Connally's jacket violently reacts.

Like I said, the "analysis" is "looks to me like they are reacting to a bullet strike".  You see what you expect to see.

Both men's wounds line up

LOL

and can be traced back to the floor with Oswald's rifle was, geez what are the chances?

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.

[Bill Chapman]

Like I said, the "analysis" is "looks to me like they are reacting to a bullet strike".  You see what you expect to see

Nah.. Kennedy suddenly decided to straighten his tie, and Connally swatted at a bee, by coincidence at the same time.

[John Mytton]

Like I said, the "analysis" is "looks to me like they are reacting to a bullet strike".  You see what you expect to see.

LOL

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.

Like I said, the "analysis" is "looks to me like they are reacting to a bullet strike".  You see what you expect to see.

The advanced cgi computer analysis and the physical evidence is that the men were lined up, their wounds were line up back towards Oswald's rifle and they violently react simultaneously, whereas your team reckons there was a dozen keystone kop snipers, nice comeback.

LOL

Nice, when you got nothing you start laughing like an idiot.

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.

See above.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

The advanced cgi computer analysis

LOL

and the physical evidence is that the men were lined up, their wounds were line up back towards Oswald's rifle and they violently react simultaneously,

LOL

Nice, when you got nothing you start laughing like an idiot.

You know what's idiotic?  Parroting "Oswald's rifle", "Oswald's window", "Oswald's shells", "Oswald's clip" over and over again like it proves anything.

Or thinking that stating a conclusion with confidence is somehow the same thing as evidence.

[Bill Chapman]

You know what's idiotic?  Parroting "Oswald's rifle", "Oswald's window", "Oswald's shells", "Oswald's clip" over and over again like it proves anything.

I prefer 'Dirty Harvey'
As in Smith, Wesson.. and Lee

[Dillon Rankine]

These "scientific" analyses amount to "looks like he's reacting to a bullet strike".  Other people make the exact same arguments about different frames.

The movements were measured photogrammetrically with reference to neurophysiological distinctions between voluntary vs involuntary reactions. One?s shoulder dropping in 55 msec is hard to do.