Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?  (Read 43593 times)

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2018, 12:26:45 AM »
Advertisement
     (1) Both the Lead Car and the JFK Limo were photographed going Fast and Accelerating directly toward the Stemmons Fwy On-Ramp, (2) There is No DPD Motorcycle cop pictured near them at that point, (3) ASAIC SA Kellerman described the JFK Limo acceleration as, "...Jumped out of the G.D. street" and (4) Jackie's remembrance of, "Then Clint Hill, he loved us, he was the first man IN The Car....We ALL LAY DOWN IN THE CAR". All of this corroborates what I have laid out. No imagination is required.  The Lead Car & the JFK Limo came to a STOP during which time Officer Chaney rolled up on his motorcycle, and SA Hill Entered the JFK Limo = "WE ALL LAY DOWN".  There's a lot we do Not know regarding what occurred from the time the JFK Limo turned onto Elm St. until it stopped at Parkland Hospital.

1.) How do you tell from a black and white still photograph how fast a car is going? By measuring the red shift?

2.) So what? Where the motorcycles appear in a photo doesn't tell you how fast the lead car was going when the motorcycle caught up.

3.) Kellerman was talking about what the limo was doing, bot the lead car, so what he said is immaterial here.

4.) How does Clint Hill or people in the back of the limo laying down prove that the lead car was "speeding/racing" or stopped, or (for that matter) that the limo stopped?



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2018, 12:26:45 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2810
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #65 on: August 29, 2018, 03:41:38 PM »
1.) How do you tell from a black and white still photograph how fast a car is going? By measuring the red shift?

2.) So what? Where the motorcycles appear in a photo doesn't tell you how fast the lead car was going when the motorcycle caught up.

3.) Kellerman was talking about what the limo was doing, bot the lead car, so what he said is immaterial here.

4.) How does Clint Hill or people in the back of the limo laying down prove that the lead car was "speeding/racing" or stopped, or (for that matter) that the limo stopped?

     We Not only have that photo, we have Films of both the Limo and Lead Car entering/exiting the Triple Underpass. Plus, the ASAIC Kellerman WC Testimony regarding the Immediate Rapid Acceleration of the Limo down Elm St. Maybe you believe the Limo and Lead Car were just toodling along until they boarded the Stemmons Fwy and Then per SA Hill cranked it up to 60-70 MPH? With the seriously injured POTUS in the rear of the Limo, this SS protocol would be ludicrous.
      If you agree that SA Hill was inside the Limo and Laying down, then where/when did whoever that is that was photographed several times spread eagle across the rear of the Limo come from? That individual took that position when the Limo was Stopped.   

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #66 on: August 29, 2018, 10:29:45 PM »
     We Not only have that photo, we have Films of both the Limo and Lead Car entering/exiting the Triple Underpass. Plus, the ASAIC Kellerman WC Testimony regarding the Immediate Rapid Acceleration of the Limo down Elm St. Maybe you believe the Limo and Lead Car were just toodling along until they boarded the Stemmons Fwy and Then per SA Hill cranked it up to 60-70 MPH? With the seriously injured POTUS in the rear of the Limo, this SS protocol would be ludicrous.
      If you agree that SA Hill was inside the Limo and Laying down, then where/when did whoever that is that was photographed several times spread eagle across the rear of the Limo come from? That individual took that position when the Limo was Stopped.

So you have Hill directly over Jackie and then another SS agent gets in and positions himself over the top of all three people in the back seat, OK now what, where does that go and what are you trying to prove?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #66 on: August 29, 2018, 10:29:45 PM »


Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #67 on: August 30, 2018, 03:53:55 AM »
     We Not only have that photo, we have Films of both the Limo and Lead Car entering/exiting the Triple Underpass. Plus, the ASAIC Kellerman WC Testimony regarding the Immediate Rapid Acceleration of the Limo down Elm St. Maybe you believe the Limo and Lead Car were just toodling along until they boarded the Stemmons Fwy and Then per SA Hill cranked it up to 60-70 MPH? With the seriously injured POTUS in the rear of the Limo, this SS protocol would be ludicrous.

I don't know if there is any film that shows the limousine west of the triple overpass. At this point, I kinda doubt you do, either. That being said, the film and photographs we have show the limousine catching up to and overtaking the lead car West of the overpass. That is, at that point, the limo is moving much
faster than the lead car. It's a mystery how you can see that happening and then decide that the lead car was always running at the same speed as the limo is beyond me as well as beyond the laws of physics.


      If you agree that SA Hill was inside the Limo and Laying down, then where/when did whoever that is that was photographed several times spread eagle across the rear of the Limo come from? That individual took that position when the Limo was Stopped.

Clint Hill laying down in the limo has no bearing on how fast the lead car was going when Cheney rode up beside it. Period.


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2810
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #68 on: August 30, 2018, 05:36:28 AM »
I don't know if there is any film that shows the limousine west of the triple overpass. At this point, I kinda doubt you do, either. That being said, the film and photographs we have show the limousine catching up to and overtaking the lead car West of the overpass. That is, at that point, the limo is moving much
faster than the lead car. It's a mystery how you can see that happening and then decide that the lead car was always running at the same speed as the limo is beyond me as well as beyond the laws of physics.


Clint Hill laying down in the limo has no bearing on how fast the lead car was going when Cheney rode up beside it. Period.

     Please review the Jack Daniel Film as to "film that shows the limousine West of the Triple Overpass. If you are serious about this discussion, kindly do your homework/research.  Your speculating as to what I do not know will continue to have you wiping egg from your face.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #68 on: August 30, 2018, 05:36:28 AM »


Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #69 on: August 31, 2018, 02:42:48 AM »
     Please review the Jack Daniel Film as to "film that shows the limousine West of the Triple Overpass. If you are serious about this discussion, kindly do your homework/research.  Your speculating as to what I do not know will continue to have you wiping egg from your face.

The Jack Daniel film confirms what I've already said based on the other photos and the Zapruder film: the limo catches up to and passes the lead car just West of the triple overpass. It also doesn't show the limo stopping. Did you think it would show different?

So far, you've told me to:

1.) Study the testimony of the guys in the lead car (Those accounts don't support your contentions about the lead car's speed).
2.) Ignore the lead car testimony, and follow what Kellerman, Hill, and Jackie said about what the limo did (Which does not address what the lead car was doing)
3.) Watch the Jack Daniel film (Again, it supports my contention that the limo was travelling much faster than the lead car)

I'm not sure why you're hellbent on proving me right at your expense, but I appreciate the generosity.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2810
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #70 on: August 31, 2018, 10:21:31 PM »
The Jack Daniel film confirms what I've already said based on the other photos and the Zapruder film: the limo catches up to and passes the lead car just West of the triple overpass. It also doesn't show the limo stopping. Did you think it would show different?

So far, you've told me to:

1.) Study the testimony of the guys in the lead car (Those accounts don't support your contentions about the lead car's speed).
2.) Ignore the lead car testimony, and follow what Kellerman, Hill, and Jackie said about what the limo did (Which does not address what the lead car was doing)
3.) Watch the Jack Daniel film (Again, it supports my contention that the limo was travelling much faster than the lead car)

I'm not sure why you're hellbent on proving me right at your expense, but I appreciate the generosity.

           The Daniel Film confirms You are Not up-to-speed on this subject. You either forgot or were Not aware it existed. You're welcome. Both the Lead Car and the JFK Limo were hauling arse and accelerating. The WC testimonies and the Daniel Film make this clear. There is No Way that Officer Chaney managed to catch up to the passenger side of the Lead Car while it was bookin' and then carry on a conversation with the Driver/Chief Curry. This ain't Indy Jones stuff.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2810
Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #71 on: August 31, 2018, 11:09:29 PM »
The momentary stop didn't happen there.

         What location = "didn't happen THERE" ?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Was the Stemmons Freeway sign removed?
« Reply #71 on: August 31, 2018, 11:09:29 PM »