Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout  (Read 12980 times)

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2018, 05:02:47 PM »
Advertisement
The world's greatest photographer (IHOO) says that Oswald was leaning at a greater angle the  Farid said, so by default he is disagreeing with Farid. Whether ia m correct or not is immaterial. A lone nutter has agreed  that the so called expert, Farid, was wrong, which is  what I have said all along.

Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

And bask in the self-illusion that you're smarter than them all.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2018, 05:02:47 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2018, 05:20:02 PM »
Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Farid says that Oswald was leaning at an angle of 5˚. Lamson says 7˚. Only to a lone nutter would this mean that they don't disagree about the angle of lean.


Quote

And bask in the self-illusion that you're smarter than them all.

Not at all. Just pointing out that Farid was not infallible. Maybe you believe you are.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2018, 05:40:47 PM »
Farid says that Oswald was leaning at an angle of 5˚. Lamson says 7˚. Only to a lone nutter would this mean that they don't disagree about the angle of lean.


In other words, nothing I said about perspective being a factor sunk in? Of course not.

And they call LNers "incurious."



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2018, 05:40:47 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2018, 12:37:53 AM »
Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Lamson and Craig are the same person.

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2018, 11:49:15 AM »
Lamson and Craig are the same person.

Lamson and Craig regularly disagree with each other. They are both very disagreeable. :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2018, 11:49:15 AM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2018, 06:57:06 PM »
Lamson and Craig regularly disagree with each other. They are both very disagreeable. :D

Hey, Ray. How's that Mitcham fellow -- who talked something about 10˚ -- doing these days? ::)


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2018, 11:41:55 AM »
Hey, Ray. How's that Mitcham fellow -- who talked something about 10˚ -- doing these days? ::)

He's fine Jerry. How's that guy, Organ, who believes in the daft single bullet theory doing?

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2018, 12:57:22 PM »
He's fine Jerry. How's that guy, Organ, who believes in the daft single bullet theory doing?

Still tooting the "physically implausible" horn. And the experts got it wrong.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2018, 12:57:22 PM »