Whose Target was General Edwin Walker?

[John Iacoletti]

[Mitch Todd]

Actually, I was thinking of the letter he wrote where he goes into more detail. However, just based on the telegram, how did Walker know the "bullet before your committee" wasn't the one he remembered seeing in 1963?

[Mitch Todd]

"Off-label." Good one. 😃  The WC's map shows that Elm Street was just as wide as Main Street and connected directly to Stemmons Freeway. Those two turns were NOT needed. End of story.

Here is CE2113:



In it, The entrance/exit ramps on Stemmons are as wide as the through carriageways, and the Stemmons carriageways are significantly narrower than Elm, Main and Commerce. BTW, the Stemmons carriageways were originally built to be 5 lanes wide, see the following:



For that matter Austin and Market are significantly narrower than Houston and Lamar, not that CE2113 knows that.

CE2113 is just not a to-scale representation of the West End. It's simply foolish to rely on it as if it were.

[Jerry Freeman]

Here is CE2113:

What does that  have to do with Walker?


 
 

[Rob Caprio]

Here is CE2113:



In it, The entrance/exit ramps on Stemmons are as wide as the through carriageways, and the Stemmons carriageways are significantly narrower than Elm, Main and Commerce. BTW, the Stemmons carriageways were originally built to be 5 lanes wide, see the following:



For that matter Austin and Market are significantly narrower than Houston and Lamar, not that CE2113 knows that.

CE2113 is just not a to-scale representation of the West End. It's simply foolish to rely on it as if it were.

You just keep changing the focus. Anything to avoid discussing the unnecessary two turns.

[Rob Caprio]

What does that  have to do with Walker?

They couldn't deal with the EAW subject so they changed the topic, but of course they can't deal with that topic either. No surprise really since they have no supporting evidence on their side.

[Mitch Todd]

You just keep changing the focus. Anything to avoid discussing the unnecessary two turns.

You're the guy who used CE2113 to argue that Elm was as wide as Main, therefore there was no reason to use Main rather than Elm. I just pointed out that your key piece of evidence isn't what you think it is or present it to be, and therefore your argument falls on its face. Your only response is to pretend I changed the subject, then repeat your now-baseless assertion in hopes no one notices you're standing buck-naked in the middle of the royal procession.

[Mitch Todd]

Actually, I was thinking of the letter he wrote where he goes into more detail. However, just based on the telegram, how did Walker know the "bullet before your committee" wasn't the one he remembered seeing in 1963?

So, John, afraid to answer my question?