Why didn't the Conspirators plant Eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza?

[John Mytton]

In Dealey Plaza there was an Umbrella Man, Dark Complected Man, guys on walkie talkies, fake SS, Crooked cops, a triangulation of snipers with lookouts, guys planting evidence, guys hiding evidence, guys swapping Mausers for Carcano's and a cast of many others so why the heck didn't these Conspirators place the most important popularly accepted evidence of all, EYEWITNESSES?

EYEWITNESSES who saw Oswald in the 6th floor window, wouldn't that be Patsy Setup 101?

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Nutters invent way more conspirators than CTs ever do.

[John Iacoletti]

In other words, nobody said they saw Oswald shooting from the 6th floor window, therefore Oswald must have done it.

[John Mytton]

Nutters invent way more conspirators than CTs ever do.

Are you sure, you keep alluding to each piece of evidence as being forged, planted, invented or intentionally incorrectly analysed, eyewitnesses as being incompetent, FBI being crooked, Dallas Police as being liars, Doctors lying, fake photographs and seriously your list never ends, so why the need to go way over the top and place your eggs in every basket because it just reeks of desperation.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

In other words, nobody said they saw Oswald shooting from the 6th floor window, therefore Oswald must have done it.

Well Brennan did testify to seeing Oswald with a rifle in the 6th floor window and it would be up to a jury to decide if his story had any credibility.

Brennan's same day affidavit description of a slender white man of about average height who appeared about 30 years old doesn't rule out Oswald and out of the people we know who were in the building at the time, the sample size wasn't exactly huge and let's not forget that Brennan did identify one or more of the black men in the windows directly below as they walked out of the building.

JohnM

[Mark Connors]

Are you sure, you keep alluding to each piece of evidence as being forged, planted, invented or intentionally incorrectly analysed, eyewitnesses as being incompetent, FBI being crooked, Dallas Police as being liars, Doctors lying, fake photographs and seriously your list never ends, so why the need to go way over the top and place your eggs in every basket because it just reeks of desperation.

JohnM

 

[Howard Gee]

In Dealey Plaza there was an Umbrella Man, Dark Complected Man, guys on walkie talkies, fake SS, Crooked cops, a triangulation of snipers with lookouts, guys planting evidence, guys hiding evidence, guys swapping Mausers for Carcano's and a cast of many others so why the heck didn't these Conspirators place the most important popularly accepted evidence of all, EYEWITNESSES?

EYEWITNESSES who saw Oswald in the 6th floor window, wouldn't that be Patsy Setup 101?

JohnM

Good question.

Here's another one.  Since the conspirators were able to fake the BY photos and alter the Zapruder film, why not just fake some photographic evidence of Saint Patsy in the 6th floor window ?

[Richard Smith]

Are you sure, you keep alluding to each piece of evidence as being forged, planted, invented or intentionally incorrectly analysed, eyewitnesses as being incompetent, FBI being crooked, Dallas Police as being liars, Doctors lying, fake photographs and seriously your list never ends, so why the need to go way over the top and place your eggs in every basket because it just reeks of desperation.

JohnM

The answer is obvious.  If you imply the evidence is suspect or fake over and over, but refuse to acknowledge that you are alleging a conspiracy (which by implication must be the case to explain the fakery), you can eat your cake and have it too.   It is the lazy contrarian/defense attorney approach when your client is stone cold guilty.  John I. is dishonest.  For example, he implied that you had posted fake info regarding who had posted on a recent thread even though he himself had participated on that thread and knew he was lying.  He did that only because he thought the thread had been deleted and no one could "prove" he was lying.  Thus, Dishonest John sought to introduce false doubt about something that he knew was true.