Was there a Larger Purpose of the Conspiracy?

[Joe Elliott]

Do the CTers here believe there was a conspiracy to murder President Kennedy, but this conspiracy never had any control of subsequent events. President Johnson may or may not get re-elected. President Johnson may or may not decide to escalate in Vietnam after his re-election in 1964. Or do they think that they did have control over these issues and that is why the President was murdered.

Or alternatively, the conspirators got control on whether to reign in the Federal Reserve.

Basically, I?m looking to see if CTers believe the conspirators had control of some aspect of the U. S. Government Policy, like whether to get involved in certain wars or not.

Vote for what you think is most probable, not necessarily for what you know absolutely to be true.

[Paul May]

Each of your choices in your poll has ?government? in it.  Bias anybody?

[Paul May]

Interesting that first choice right now has the most votes.  How do you explain that?

[Paul May]

I see.  So, you?re stating people on this site are being paid for their position on JFK event?  Is that correct?

[Jon Banks]

Do the CTers here believe there was a conspiracy to murder President Kennedy, but this conspiracy never had any control of subsequent events. President Johnson may or may not get re-elected. President Johnson may or may not decide to escalate in Vietnam after his re-election in 1964. Or do they think that they did have control over these issues and that is why the President was murdered.

Or alternatively, the conspirators got control on whether to reign in the Federal Reserve.

Basically, I?m looking to see if CTers believe the conspirators had control of some aspect of the U. S. Government Policy, like whether to get involved in certain wars or not.

Vote for what you think is most probable, not necessarily for what you know absolutely to be true.

Ask yourself,

Who had the most to gain from JFK?s murder?

- The Mafia: Attorney General Robert Kennedy declared war on organized crime. Removing JFK would?ve ensured that a more favorable AG took over.

- The anti-Castro Hawks: They were xxxxxx at JFK because of the BOP and Cuban Missile crisis. If they had succeeded at linking Oswald to Castro (attempts were made to do exactly that), they would?ve almost ensured that they?d get the US to go to war against Cuba.

- Fidel Castro: He knew the CIA under Kennedy was trying to kill him. Having Kennedy killed would?ve sent a strong message but also could?ve potentially lead to an unwinnable war if it was found that Cuba conspired against Kennedy.

- The Far Right in the US South: The Civil Rights movement was gaining momentum by the time JFK?s administration started drafting the Civil Rights Act. I don?t think anyone could?ve predicted that Lyndon Johnson would be make a strong push to pass the Civil Rights Act. The conventional wisdom was probably that Johnson, a White southerner, wouldn?t go big on Civil Rights.

[Paul May]

So, when you have no response you revert directly to ad hom attack. You can?t even defend your own poll with any degree of insight.  I won?t comment on your ignorance.  People can read this thread.  What a hoot.

[Paul May]

You implied people on this site are being paid for their positions on the JFK event. How can you seriously make that comment?

[Paul May]

So, once again, rather than answer a DIRECT question ABOUT YOUR OWN POLL, you digress with misdirection. Remarkable.  Unlike yourself, I will respond.  Of course people will respond a certain way if paid to do so.  That being said, this forum might have a few hundred posters at best out of a world wide population.  So, let?s say 50 people respond to your poll out of a world population of some 8 billion people. Let?s then assume 50% are honest researchers giving an opinion. That leaves 25 people of which you believe a portion of those people are being paid by some entity to go on JFK Internet forums/blogs in the event somebody does a poll.  Does that about sum it up?