Roger Craig

[Walt Cakebread]

Craig DID see a mauser on the 6th floor. The only problem was that he saw it there in 1968 in his own imagination.

He also really DID see 3 spent shells neatly lined up in the snipers nest (in 1968 in his own imagination).

If people can imagine their own genders, why can't Craig imagine a mauser on the 6th floor?

If we could know the truth, I'd bet that Weitzman talked to Craig about his interview with FBI agent A1bert Sayers and Weitzman told Craig that he'd been handed the rifle that he and Boone had discovered and it was a 7.65 mauser, and that identification of the caliber was "STAMPED RIGHT THERE ON THE BARREL"

But Craig with his gargantuan ego made up the tale that he had seen that stamp when he was "not more than six or eight inches from the rifle" when Day held it up to Fritz.   

PS.... It is reported that Seymour Weitzman had psychological  problems for the rest of his life following the coup d e'tat.    Can anybody verify the rumor ?

[Jerry Freeman]

 

He also really DID see 3 spent shells ...
 

Mr. BELIN - Do you recall any of the shells right up against the wall at all---- or, don't you recall?
Mr. CRAIG - No; I don't; I didn't look that close.

                                                                                           

[Walt Cakebread]

                                                                                           

Some DPD photos show only TWO spent shells..... But the DPD mixed the authentic photos in with the fake photos so I'm sure there will be those who point out that other photos show three spent shells.

[Jack Trojan]

With people like you posting nonsense.... We never will get to the bottom of it....

As if you are going to get to the bottom of it. There is a very good chance that some token shots were taken from the 6th floor so witnesses could direct the cops to where they thought the shots came from. This was crucial so the DPD could converge on Oswald in record time. So that being the case, then an Oswald surrogate took a few shots with a Mauser, ditched it then escaped the scene. You acknowledge that Oswald didn't take any shots himself, so someone else must have. The conspirators would have used a surrogate who looked somewhat like Oswald. What is so nonsensical about that scenario? I think your claim that no shots came from the 6th floor is equally ludicrous because the conspirators needed to draw attention to the 6th floor so Fritz could do his magic. Otherwise, why else did the DPD go there, find the rifle(s) and converge on Oswald in the theater an hour after he supposedly took the shots? Do you think that Fritz was a genius and the DPD were crackerjack cops? Get real.

You need to extract your head and open your lyin' eyes to how the Big Event must have went down rather than focus exclusively on the so-called "evidence" that you glean from the internet, fed to you by the conspirators, which you consider gospel.

[Walt Cakebread]

As if you are going to get to the bottom of it. There is a very good chance that some token shots were taken from the 6th floor so witnesses could direct the cops to where they thought the shots came from. This was crucial so the DPD could converge on Oswald in record time. So that being the case, then an Oswald surrogate took a few shots with a Mauser, ditched it then escaped the scene. You acknowledge that Oswald didn't take any shots himself, so someone else must have. The conspirators would have used a surrogate who looked somewhat like Oswald. What is so nonsensical about that scenario? I think your claim that no shots came from the 6th floor is equally ludicrous because the conspirators needed to draw attention to the 6th floor so Fritz could do his magic. Otherwise, why else did the DPD go there, find the rifle(s) and converge on Oswald in the theater an hour after he supposedly took the shots? Do you think that Fritz was a genius and the DPD were crackerjack cops? Get real.

You need to extract your head and open your lyin' eyes to how the Big Event must have went down rather than focus exclusively on the so-called "evidence" that you glean from the internet, fed to you by the conspirators, which you consider gospel.

You're fool Mr Trojan.

[Jack Trojan]

You're fool Mr Trojan.

And you're an idiot. Checkmate, fool! 

ps. Let he who claims "nonsense" cast the 1st stone. Extract your head and try again.

[Walt Cakebread]

And you're an idiot. Checkmate, fool! 

ps. Let he who claims "nonsense" cast the 1st stone. Extract your head and try again.

I tried to engage you in a disscussion about the 7.65 mauser......  but you insist that it was found along with the carcano and there were actually two rifles there on the sixth floor....  I believe that is absurd.

[Jack Trojan]

I tried to engage you in a disscussion about the 7.65 mauser......  but you insist that it was found along with the carcano and there were actually two rifles there on the sixth floor....  I believe that is absurd.

First off, I never insisted there were 2 rifles found on the 6th floor, only that you don't know that there weren't. I'm playing the devil's advocate that you can't be 100% certain that Craig and Weitzman were lying about seeing a Mauser in the TSBD just because it wasn't shown on Alyea's film footage. You think it's absurd because you buy into the testimony from the conspirators and you think that the Alyea film tells the whole story. But Alyea didn't film the hulls at the SN so does that mean they didn't exist? You know damn well the provenance for ALL the evidence is crap as well as shady. The DPD planted all the evidence, didn't they? They certainly weren't worried about getting their prints all over EVERYTHING.

I tried to have a discussion about the 7.65 Mauser with you but you glazed over. I only have a couple of questions for you:

1) Why would Weitzman have been shown a Mauser if it had nothing to do with the Big Event?
2) Why do you think the conspirators would not have placed a shooter in the SN so they could frame Oswald?

Answer my 2 absurd questions and we'll take it from there, if you dare.