Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Martin Weidmann]

And I would have more respect for an LNer who just tries to support his claims with evidence and enters into an open and honest discussion about it instead of one who constantly throws around claims like "It has already been proven beyond reasonable doubt, just read the WC and HSCA reports".


First of all, they're not my claims. What I do is to base my opinion on the conclusions reached by investigative bodies such as the WC and the HSCA based on the evidence these august bodies have uncovered and provided. I also rely on additional sources which validate the evidence provided by the WC and the HSCA or that invalidate or update on the evidence and conclusions reached by the WC and the HSCA.

Second, Bill Brown has given you the opportunity to enter "into an open and honest discussion" on just one topic and you have run away from it. But here you're contradicting yourself. You don't want to have any type of discussion because you don't want to play the game.

First of all, they're not my claims. What I do is to base my opinion on the conclusions reached by investigative bodies such as the WC and the HSCA based on the evidence these august bodies have uncovered and provided. I also rely on additional sources which validate the evidence provided by the WC and the HSCA or that invalidate or update on the evidence and conclusions reached by the WC and the HSCA. 

And thus are they your claims after all!

Second, Bill Brown has given you the opportunity to enter "into an open and honest discussion" on just one topic and you have run away from it. But here you're contradicting yourself. You don't want to have any type of discussion because you don't want to play the game.

Bill Brown can give me as many opportunities as he likes. That doesn't mean I have to accept them. Experience shows that there can not be an "open and honest" discussion with him because that would include respecting the other's opinion and not looking for ways to mock and attack.

I haven't been talking to Bill Brown for a long time and for exactly those reasons and I have seen no reason to change my mind. I do indeed do not want to play his usual game.

Btw, I am still talking to you, so where did you get the notion that I want to have any type of discussion?

[Rob Caprio]

Regardless of whether CE-162 is Oswald's jacket or not (it is), the fact remains that he left the rooming house zipping up a jacket as he went out the door and then was seen by a multitude of witnesses (near the scene of the Tippit slaying) wearing a jacket.

Why did he have no jacket on when he was seen by Brewer?

How do we know that he was seen by Brewer? Oh, that's right, because Brewer said so.

[Rob Caprio]

Ha  Nice.

The real question is... why do some try their best to clear the name of a proven cop-killer?

That day, a policeman lost his life while on duty.

A better question is -- why do some accuse LHO of two murders when there isn't any supporting evidence for these claims?

[Bill Brown]

Second, Bill Brown has given you the opportunity to enter "into an open and honest discussion" on just one topic and you have run away from it. But here you're contradicting yourself. You don't want to have any type of discussion because you don't want to play the game.

Well said, Oscar.

[Bill Brown]

Second, Bill Brown has given you the opportunity to enter "into an open and honest discussion" on just one topic and you have run away from it. But here you're contradicting yourself. You don't want to have any type of discussion because you don't want to play the game.

Bill Brown can give me as many opportunities as he likes. That doesn't mean I have to accept them. Experience shows that there can not be an "open and honest" discussion with him because that would include respecting the other's opinion and not looking for ways to mock and attack.

I haven't been talking to Bill Brown for a long time and for exactly those reasons and I have seen no reason to change my mind. I do indeed do not want to play his usual game.

In the thread titled "At The End Of The Day, It was Oswald's Rifle", you entered into a discussion with Oscar Navarro.  After a certain number of posts back and forth, you finally got frustrated with Oscar and called him "stupid".

Oscar had not insulted you before that and, to the best of my recollection, he didn't insult you after that, either.

Oscar Navarro can judge for himself if there is any validity to your above whining.  Just like you did with him, you insulted me far before I ever thought about throwing an insult your way; it's clearly what you do when you grow frustrated.

[Bill Chapman]

How do we know that he was seen by Brewer? Oh, that's right, because Brewer said so.

If you have an explanation as to why Brewer would lie, let's hear it.

[Bill Chapman]

If you can't trust the evidence, you can't trust any conclusions based on it either.

My condolences

And thanks for offering yours regarding my recent loss

[Martin Weidmann]

RoboCall still hasn't cited his 2 year old claim that 98% of the world (yes, the WORLD, no less) believes there was a conspiracy re JFK.

Don't expect anything more than a canned, hollow response.

Don't be silly, it takes a bit of time to count everybody.