Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 186208 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #608 on: May 29, 2018, 04:22:05 AM »
Advertisement
Only a dishonest person who is not interested in the truth would make a big deal out of the light-colored jacket being called white by some.

Anyone with any sense at all is perfectly aware that a light-grey jacket could easily be called white by some people.  To deny this only proves the agenda of some.

If anyone were really interested in the truth, even a conspiracy believer, they wouldn't even bother mentioning this light-grey versus white thing, as if it means a damn thing.

The dishonesty is a shame, really.

The person with an agenda is the one who claims trained law enforcement officers couldn't tell a light grey jacket from a white one. Please.


I rest my case.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #608 on: May 29, 2018, 04:22:05 AM »


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #609 on: May 29, 2018, 05:09:13 AM »
If I'm not mistaken, the jacket was found before Saint Oz was arrested.

The conspirators were amazingly fast in planting that jacket replete with fibers in it that match the shirt Saint Oz was wearing, weren't they ?

It's positively amazing that the conspirators knew that Saint Oz would be arrested without a jacket and that his landlady would report that he was wearing one when he left the boarding house.

Poor Saint Oz. More evidence that points to the innocent patsy's guilt.

He really had a bad day.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #610 on: May 29, 2018, 05:53:29 AM »
I believe Tim is saying that an item of evidence can sometimes be verified as being authentic and true even if there is a problem, on some level, with the chain of custody of said item.

Maybe in front of the Warren Commission.

See how it holds up in a real courtroom where the defendant has legal representation, the witnesses are

cross examined and exculpatory evidence is allowed.
 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #610 on: May 29, 2018, 05:53:29 AM »


Offline Michael Chambers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #611 on: May 29, 2018, 11:16:20 AM »
If I'm not mistaken, the jacket was found before Saint Oz was arrested.

The conspirators were amazingly fast in planting that jacket replete with fibers in it that match the shirt Saint Oz was wearing, weren't they ?

It's positively amazing that the conspirators knew that Saint Oz would be arrested without a jacket and that his landlady would report that he was wearing one when he left the boarding house.

Poor Saint Oz. More evidence that points to the innocent patsy's guilt.

He really had a bad day.


Do you think the landlady saying about the jacket and zipping it is that strong? Some say she also says Oswald entered and exited behind her back and so not seen by her he could even have been an Oswald imposter and at least meaning she couldn't have seen him zipping a jacket.

source = http://assassinationofjfk.net/looking-at-the-tippit-case-from-a-different-angle/

{scroll about one inch down for that specific paragraph}

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10882
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #612 on: May 29, 2018, 05:56:33 PM »
If I'm not mistaken, the jacket was found before Saint Oz was arrested.

The conspirators were amazingly fast in planting that jacket replete with fibers in it that match the shirt Saint Oz was wearing, weren't they ?

It's positively amazing that the conspirators knew that Saint Oz would be arrested without a jacket and that his landlady would report that he was wearing one when he left the boarding house.

Poor Saint Oz. More evidence that points to the innocent patsy's guilt.

He really had a bad day.

Straight out of the LN playbook.  If a piece of "evidence" can't be authenticated, then make an appeal to a strawman of "vast conspirators" and hope that will distract everyone from noticing your unauthenticated evidence.

Then never actually explain how a jacket in a parking lot is evidence of murder in the first place...

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #612 on: May 29, 2018, 05:56:33 PM »


Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #613 on: May 29, 2018, 06:06:13 PM »
Whatever you do , don't ever go into a theater without paying ! But wait a minute ! Oswald did pay !

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10882
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #614 on: May 29, 2018, 06:28:35 PM »
Whatever you do , don't ever go into a theater without paying ! But wait a minute ! Oswald did pay !

Julia Postal wasn't sure if he paid or not.  I don't know why the LNers are so sure he didn't.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #615 on: May 29, 2018, 07:44:25 PM »
The Jacket found was not Oswalds . The  jacket found had a Cleaners tag (30 030) in it and also had a dry cleaning tag ( B 9738 ) Oswalds jackets were washed by Marina and the color of Oswalds jackets were a dark Blue jacket and a light weight Gray Jacket . Benavides said the man he saw was wearing a white jacket and Oswald did not have a white jacket !

Wow...it took 79 pages of this thread to get to this here
Did they test the jacket for gunpowder residue?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #615 on: May 29, 2018, 07:44:25 PM »