Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Howard Gee]

LOL.  Something isn't "significant" just because the cowardly troll boy wants it to be.  Answer the question, Howard:

Do you have any good reasons to believe that CE 162

a) was the jacket found in the parking lot?
b) belonged to Oswald?
c) demonstrates anything at all about who killed Tippit?

Here's your chance to show that you have something other than schoolboy insults.

Cowardly troll boy

Another bad hair day, I guess.

Sorry Johnny, I've already explained why the jacket being found before Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

Can't make you understand something above your intelligence and pay level.

[John Iacoletti]

Sorry Johnny, I've already explained why the bag being found before Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

You didn't explain anything.  You just declared that it was significant because of something you imagined your strawman "conspirators" wouldn't do.

And you have the nerve to call what others write "comedy".

Still waiting on the answers...

[Howard Gee]

I clearly explained why the jacket being found BEFORE Saint Oz was arrested is significant.

It's still there for you to see and for anyone else that wants to read it.

No strawman.

Can't help you anymore than that Johnny.

CAN'T FIX STUPID

[Jerry Freeman]

And in this matter, the fanbois would be right. It would be exculpatory evidence. It would be hard to imagine Saint Oz wearing two jackets. 

 

2nd Testimony of Oswald's 'cab driver' Wm Whaley..

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Whaley, the purpose of our meeting today is to take some further testimony concerning the events surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy, and we understand you have some facts that will bear on it in a way and we would like to ask you questions concerning it.
*******************************************************
Mr. BALL. Did you notice how he was dressed?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir. I didn't pay much attention to it right then. But it all came back when I really found out who I had. He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind of jacket, I didn't notice very close but I think it was a work jacket that almost matched the pants.
He, his shirt was open three buttons down here. He had on a T-shirt. You know, the shirt was open three buttons down there.

 The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.
"It all came back to him" after some apparent persuasion [from somebody]
 

[Tim Nickerson]

Then show us how smart you are: Who found that jacket?

It doesn't matter who first saw the jacket. It's of no importance.

[Howard Gee]

2nd Testimony of Oswald's 'cab driver' Wm Whaley..

 The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.
"It all came back to him" after some apparent persuasion [from somebody]
 

Whether Saint Oz was wearing a jacket or not when he was in the cab has no importance. Just like who found the jacket doesn't matter.

What does matter is if Saint Oz was wearing a jacket when he left his room.

If he was, then it's hard to understand why he no longer has a jacket when he's arrested.

The implication that the jacket that was found wasn't his, or was planted is pretty much destroyed by the fibers that matched his arrest shirt in the jacket and the fact that the conspirators would have had to known that Saint Oz wouldn't have had a jacket when he was arrested. The cops woud look pretty dumb arresting someone with a jacket when the suspect they were looking for discarded his after murdering JDT.

I know this is too much common sense for the Ozzie fanbois, but don't let common sense get in the way of your Oz worshipping.

[Tim Nickerson]

The cab driver had Oswald wearing a jacket before he ever [supposedly] put one on.

And Bardwell Odum had Oswald wearing a jacket in the Texas Theatre. So what?

[Martin Weidmann]

Whether Saint Oz was wearing a jacket or not when he was in the cab has no importance. Just like who found the jacket doesn't matter.

What does matter is if Saint Oz was wearing a jacket when he left his room.

If he was, then it's hard to understand why he no longer has a jacket when he's arrested.

The implication that the jacket that was found wasn't his, or was planted is pretty much destroyed by the fibers that matched his arrest shirt in the jacket and the fact that the conspirators would have had to known that Saint Oz wouldn't have had a jacket when he was arrested. The cops woud look pretty dumb arresting someone with a jacket when the suspect they were looking for discarded his after murdering JDT.

I know this is too much common sense for the Ozzie fanbois, but don't let common sense get in the way of your Oz worshipping.

What does matter is if Saint Oz was wearing a jacket when he left his room.

If he was, then it's hard to understand why he no longer has a jacket when he's arrested.

What kind of weird "logic" is this? How can you even be sure that Oswald didn't have jacket at the Texas Theater? How does the fact that he wasn't wearing a jacket when he was arrested justify the conclusion that he didn't have a jacket? What makes you eliminate the possibility that a jacket simply was never found or looked for?

The implication that the jacket that was found wasn't his, or was planted is pretty much destroyed by the fibers that matched his arrest shirt in the jacket

Really? Are you sure you have thought this trough? How can you even begin to be sure that the white jacket that was found at the parking lot was indeed the grey jacket that actually belonged to Oswald?

and the fact that the conspirators would have had to known [sic] that Saint Oz wouldn't have had a jacket when he was arrested.

What makes you think the jacket would have been part of any master plan? What makes you even sure that Oswald didn't have a jacket at the Texas Theater?

The cops woud [sic] look pretty dumb arresting someone with a jacket when the suspect they were looking for discarded his after murdering JDT.

No dumber than when they only rely on a half blind woman (who was concentrating on getting the TV to work and thus had her back turned towards the living room when Oswald walked from his room to the front door in a matter of seconds) to conclude that Oswald did indeed leave the rooming house wearing a jacket in the first place!

I know this is too much common sense for the Ozzie fanbois, but don't let common sense get in the way of your Oz worshipping


Your desperate desire to have Oswald be the lone nut gunman is clouding your judgment. Who cares about the facts (all the facts, that is) when you have already made up your mind, right?