Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Bill Brown]

Can you prove that those fibers came from that shirt to the exclusion of any other shirt?

What are you talking about?

Any other shirt?  Do you somehow believe just ANY other shirt has dark blue, gray-black and orange-yellow cotton fibers?

The fibers from the jacket sleeve did indeed match microscopic fibers from Oswald's arrest shirt.

Of course, the fibers from the jacket sleeve could have come from other shirts which consisted of dark blue, gray-black and orange-yellow cotton fibers.

[John Mytton]

Nice cherry-pick.  Keep in mind, this is the same "utter screwball" who claimed

- Tippit tried to talk to her and knew she was there, even though he was killed instantly.
- She was there all by herself screaming for help for 5-10 minutes but nobody responded.
- She tried to save Tippit's life.
- She tried to use Tippit's police radio to call for help.
- That the man talked to Tippit through the passenger side window, but it was rolled up.
- That Benavides was a policeman.

Before I start, Markham was raising a family and held a steady job, some screwball?

- Tippit tried to talk to her and knew she was there, even though he was killed instantly.

The officer moved slightly and groaned but never said anything that he could understand.
Frank Cimino

- She was there all by herself screaming for help for 5-10 minutes but nobody responded.

From when it happened till an ambulance response was 5-10 minutes.

- She tried to save Tippit's life.

She was holding Tippit's head up and talked to him to keep him awake but Tippit's agonal gasps were just involuntary.

- She tried to use Tippit's police radio to call for help.

She may have at some point.

- That the man talked to Tippit through the passenger side window, but it was rolled up.

The right front passenger door air vent window was open.

- That Benavides was a policeman.

Even if true how that make someone a screwball?


Talk about desperate, an easily refuted and pathetic list.



JohnM

[Bill Brown]

Yet, none of them say that there were two assailants.

Acquilla Clemons did.  So did Frank Wright.

I was referring to real witnesses, people who actually saw something.

How did real witnesses like Benavides, Markham and Scoggins manage to not notice this second assailant?

In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?

This doesn't even take into account the fact that Wright changed his story later.  He told reporter Earl Golz that the assailant didn't get into his car after all, saying that the man ran alongside the car yelling at the driver as the driver sped off (supposedly straight towards Clemmons, by the way).

[Bill Brown]

Is this supposed to somehow prove that CE162 was Oswald's jacket?

Not at all.  it was a direct reply to Gary Craig's dumb ass post that the jacket was not Oswald's since it was a size Medium.  Did I really have to explain this to you?

[John Mytton]

I was referring to real witnesses, people who actually saw something.

How did real witnesses like Benavides, Markham and Scoggins manage to not notice this second assailant?

In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?

This doesn't even take into account the fact that Wright changed his story later.  He told reporter Earl Golz that the assailant didn't get into his car after all, saying that the man ran alongside the car yelling at the driver as the driver sped off (supposedly straight towards Clemmons, by the way).

In October of 1964, Wright told George and Patricia Nash that he saw the assailant get into his car and drive away, heading west on Tenth Street.  Acquilla Clemmons told Mark Lane that the two men both left on foot.  Which one of them do you want to rely on?

Ouch!
That's the difference, this happens time and time again, our eyewitnesses are all corroborated because their recollections are based on reality whereas the conspiracy eyewitnesses are totally inconsistent because they don't have a foundation in truth. That's why Iacoletti never supports his claims with evidence because upon scrutiny they all fall apart.


JohnM

[John Mytton]

The actual (something that you ignore) shows that the jacket found was WHITE. Live with it.

Stop trying to change the law of physics, it's scientifically demonstrable that Oswald's jacket under strong sunlight looks white. Cmon Caprio, if this is all you got then you got zilch!





JohnM

[John Mytton]

Duh, chain of custody.

The chain of custody is clear, what's your problem this time?



JohnM

[John Mytton]

So was it a shirt or "sort of a jacket?"

Oswald's garment was in front of Marina and she knew it as Oswald's.



JohnM