Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[John Iacoletti]

First of all, Callaway saw Oswald run by with a gun in his hands and wearing an Eisenhower-type jacket moments after the shooting, not minutes.

Oh brother.  How many "moments" are in a minute?  When did Callaway ever say "moments" anyway?

Anyway, Markham saw Oswald shoot Tippit.  Scoggins saw the same man that Markham saw.  Scoggins saw this man run from Tippit's patrol car towards Patton, cut across the Davis lawn and head down Patton towards Jefferson.  Both Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis saw the same man that Scoggins saw.  The Davis sisters saw this man cut across their lawn and turn the corner onto Patton.  Callaway saw the same man coming from Tenth, cutting through the Davis yard towards Scoggins hiding beside his cab, running down Patton with a gun in his hands.

Correction:

Markham saw a man shoot Tippit who she identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Scoggins saw a man going south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
The Davis sisters-in-law saw a man going across their lawn who they identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Callaway saw a man running south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.

That doesn't necessarily mean that they all saw Oswald or that they even saw the same man.

[Bill Brown]

Oh brother.  How many "moments" are in a minute?  When did Callaway ever say "moments" anyway?

Correction:

Markham saw a man shoot Tippit who she identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Scoggins saw a man going south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
The Davis sisters-in-law saw a man going across their lawn who they identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.
Callaway saw a man running south on Patton who he identified as Oswald in an unfair lineup.

That doesn't necessarily mean that they all saw Oswald or that they even saw the same man.

Well then feel free to prove that these witnesses saw different men.

Claim the lineups were unfair.  Okay.

Claim the witness identification was wrong and it was not Oswald who they saw.  Okay.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

[John Mytton]

So people impersonating SS agents gives you no pause? Of course not as you have your patsy already picked out.

So people impersonating SS agents gives you no pause?

Sure if you had some corroboration and your SS agents were somewhere closer to Elm street but alas all you have is the word of one person seeing SS agents somewhere in the suburbs, so what?

Of course not as you have your patsy already picked out.

You say Oswald was a lousy shot and liked Kennedy, who in their right mind would pick Oswald to be a Patsy?



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Btw, how much is "astronomical"?

A lot more than "close to astronomical"!



JohnM

[John Mytton]

They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

So none of the other guys had any bruises? cite?



JohnM

[Gary Craig]

[John Iacoletti]

The report was posted in my series already. Unfortunately this site was hacked and it is gone. I will repost it sometime in the future, but the evidence is still there.

Detective Marvin Buhk's report to Curry.

[John Iacoletti]

Well then feel free to prove that these witnesses saw different men.

Claim the lineups were unfair.  Okay.

Claim the witness identification was wrong and it was not Oswald who they saw.  Okay.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.