Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[John Iacoletti]

Then show that Day was wrong about the date the photo was taken.  Fair enough?

Then show that Day was right about the date the photo was taken.  Fair enough?

I'm comfortable saying "I don't know".  How about you?

[Bill Brown]

Then show that Day was right about the date the photo was taken.  Fair enough?

I'm comfortable saying "I don't know".  How about you?

I'm open to accepting information which suggests that Day was wrong when he said the photo was taken on the 26th.  No one has provided any.  Until then, I accept that the photo was taken three days AFTER those items were analyzed by Stombaugh.

[John Iacoletti]

Of course it's a possibility that contamination could have occurred.

Thank you.

  But, a photo taken three days after Stombaugh analyzed those items doesn't prove contamination.

But a claim about when a photo was taken doesn't prove that's when the photo was taken.

The five shot scenario in the Tippit shooting is most definitely my onion.  I've always stated it only as my opinion.

ok

How so?

Because in one case you do nothing to prove that your opinion is true, but you demand that others do.

[John Iacoletti]

I'm open to accepting information which suggests that Day was wrong when he said the photo was taken on the 26th.  No one has provided any.  Until then, I accept that the photo was taken three days AFTER those items were analyzed by Stombaugh.

Cool.  I'm open to accept evidence that both of these photos were taken after Stombaugh analyzed the bag.

[Bill Brown]

Thank you.

But a claim about when a photo was taken doesn't prove that's when the photo was taken.

ok

Because in one case you do nothing to prove that your opinion is true, but you demand that others do.

I haven't demanded a single thing of others.

Someone ill-advisedly posted the photo as if it proves that the blanket and bag came in contact with each other and therefore Stombaugh's analysis (that the fibers found inside the bag matched the blanket fibers) is irrelevant.  I am saying that Day stated the photo was taken on the 26th, three days AFTER Stombaugh examined the two items.  No one, including you, has shown otherwise.

[Bill Brown]

Cool.  I'm open to accept evidence that both of these photos were taken after Stombaugh analyzed the bag.

No, you're not.

Day said that the photo was taken as they were turning the evidence over to the FBI for the 2nd time.  That, in Day's mind, timestamps the photo.

You automatically reject it because he's a police officer and therefore, dishonest or wrong.

[John Iacoletti]

I haven't demanded a single thing of others.

Someone ill-advisedly posted the photo as if it proves that the blanket and bag came in contact with each other and therefore Stombaugh's analysis (that the fibers found inside the bag matched the blanket fibers) is irrelevant.  I am saying that Day stated the photo was taken on the 26th, three days AFTER Stombaugh examined the two items.  No one, including you, has shown otherwise.

Nobody, including you, has shown that Day's claim was correct.  Too bad they didn't show Day this photo.

[Bill Brown]

Nobody, including you, has shown that Day's claim was correct.

So Day's testimony that he knows the date the photo was taken is questionable... but Tague's testimony is 100% spot-on when he says he remembers a shot AFTER he was hit on the cheek.

And you call me the hypocrite.  LOL