Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Tim Nickerson]

Nobody, including you, has shown that Day's claim was correct.  Too bad they didn't show Day this photo.

What insightful information could Day possibly offer about that photo?

[John Iacoletti]

So Day's testimony that he knows the date the photo was taken is questionable... but Tague's testimony is 100% spot-on when he says he remembers a shot AFTER he was hit on the cheek.

Except I didn't say that.  Nice try.

[John Iacoletti]

Someone ill-advisedly posted the photo as if it proves that the blanket and bag came in contact with each other

Strawman.

[John Iacoletti]

What insightful information could Day possibly offer about that photo?

I don't know.  Why did they think he could provide insightful information about CE 738?

[John Iacoletti]

No, you're not.

Day said that the photo was taken as they were turning the evidence over to the FBI for the 2nd time.  That, in Day's mind, timestamps the photo.

That's just your speculation.  Day didn't say what in his mind timestamped the photo.

You automatically reject it because he's a police officer and therefore, dishonest or wrong.

Nope.  You're automatically accepting it because he said so.  I'm asking how did he know?

[Bill Brown]

Except I didn't say that.  Nice try.

And Day was actually there, therefore he knows when that photo was taken.

Why is Day questionable but Tague is not?

[Bill Brown]

Strawman.

That's not a straw man at all.  Someone did indeed post the photo as if it proved that the two items came into contact with each other before they were examined.  It may have been you who made the mistake of posting that photo, but I don't really recall now.

[Tim Nickerson]

I don't know.  Why did they think he could provide insightful information about CE 738?

Because the photograph of the items was taken while they were in the possession of the DPD.