Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[John Iacoletti]

And Day was actually there, therefore he knows when that photo was taken.

Why is Day questionable but Tague is not?

Huh?  Are you saying that Tague was not there wen he was struck?

Anyway this is another strawman.  When did I say that Tague was not questionable?  Tim stated as a fact that Tague was hit by a fragment from the head shot.  I merely pointed out that Tague disagreed.

[John Iacoletti]

That's not a straw man at all.  Someone did indeed post the photo as if it proved that the two items came into contact with each other before they were examined.  It may have been you who made the mistake of posting that photo, but I don't really recall now.

Your recall isn't any better than Day's.

Go back through the thread and find anybody saying that this photo proved that the two items came into contact with each other before they were examined.

[John Iacoletti]

Because the photograph of the items was taken while they were in the possession of the DPD.

And the other one wasn't?

[Bill Brown]

That's just your speculation.  Day didn't say what in his mind timestamped the photo.

Wrong (again).

Day absolutely did explain why he recalls that the photo was taken on the 26th.

[Bill Brown]

Huh?  Are you saying that Tague was not there wen he was struck?

Anyway this is another strawman.  When did I say that Tague was not questionable?  Tim stated as a fact that Tague was hit by a fragment from the head shot.  I merely pointed out that Tague disagreed.

So, you're allowed to "merely point out" but other forum members are not?

I am "merely pointing out" that Day said the photo was taken on the 26th.

You don't have to prove that Tague was correct but somehow I do have to prove that Day was correct.

Again, YOU are the hypocrite.

[John Iacoletti]

Wrong (again).

Day absolutely did explain why he recalls that the photo was taken on the 26th.

Speaking of an inability to understand what is written.

Mr. BELIN. I am going to now hand you what has been marked as 738 and ask you to state if you know what this is.
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir. This is a photograph of most of the evidence that was returned to the FBI the second time on November 26, 1963. It was released to Agent Vince Drain at 2 p.m., November 26.

Where does Day even say when the picture was taken?

[John Iacoletti]

So, you're allowed to "merely point out" but other forum members are not?

I am "merely pointing out" that Day said the photo was taken on the 26th.

You don't have to prove that Tague was correct but somehow I do have to prove that Day was correct.

Again, YOU are the hypocrite.

You claimed that Day is correct.  I'm not claiming that Tague was correct.  That's the difference.

[Bill Brown]

Speaking of an inability to understand what is written.

Mr. BELIN. I am going to now hand you what has been marked as 738 and ask you to state if you know what this is.
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir. This is a photograph of most of the evidence that was returned to the FBI the second time on November 26, 1963. It was released to Agent Vince Drain at 2 p.m., November 26.

Where does Day even say when the picture was taken?

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.  Hell, the photo could have been taken the day before being turned over to the FBI.  That would still have Stombaugh analyzing the bag and blanket BEFORE the photo was taken.

Stombaugh analyzed those two items on the 23rd.  Assuming that you believe Stombaugh.  Do you?  Or is he wrong or lying, too?