I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[Rob Caprio]

I am not going to simply cite a number of two. I wrote a whole book about
why I moved from believing in conspiracy to knowing that Lee Harvey Oswald
was the lone gunman. Look, don't read my book. It's not for you. That is obvious.

You are correct as it seems NOT to be based on the actual evidence because none of that, including the HSCA stuff, supports the WC's conclusion.

I rely on the evidence and not someone's opinion. Calling people who don't accept an unsupported conclusion "freaks" is offensive too.

[Rob Caprio]

Is that the article which contains a big chunk of author's speculation? Surprised it didn't mention Larry Crafard either.

But you have no problem supporting the speculation of the WC, right?

Here is what real judges think of the WCR.

Quote on

The Warren Report? All three judges in the case [Clay Shaw] agreed that it was inadmissible as evidence in judicial proceedings.

"If we are going to accept the Warren Report as factual, then we have wasted a week of time", Judge Bagert declared near the end of the hearing.

Another judge, Matthew S. Braniff, said of the Warren Report: "It is fraught with hearsay and contradictions."

"And that's putting it mildly," Bagert commented.

A few days later, Judge Edward A. Haggerty Jr., who had been appointed to preside at the trial of Clay Shaw, also said the Warren Report could not be admitted as evidence at the trial.

(Excerpted from "The Garrison Inquiry" by Joachim Joesten, 1967, p. 70)

Quote off

[Nicholas Turner]

But you have no problem supporting the speculation of the WC, right?

No.

[Rob Caprio]

Well, now we can all go home. John Armstrong, the guy who thinks there were two Oswalds and two Marguerites running around has cracked the case! 

The issue of two Oswalds goes way back before John Armstrong. How do you explain all the discrepancies in LHO's height and eye color?

[Rob Caprio]

No.

Why the double standard?

[Nicholas Turner]

Why the double standard?

What double standard?

Edit: I meant no, you aren't right, not no I have no problem supporting speculation by the WC. So no double standards.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

The issue of two Oswalds goes way back before John Armstrong. How do you explain all the discrepancies in LHO's height and eye color?

I don't explain every discrepancy. Professional investigators (police, FBI) know that in any case there will be anomalies. In a case with millions of pieces of information like the JFK case, there are probably thousands of things that are "outliers." Completely normal.

[John Iacoletti]

Of course I can. That is why I wrote a book! I don't think I want to post 272 pages
on this forum.

So you're just marketing here then.

I don't think I want to shell out 17 bucks and wade through 272 pages of "the WC and HSCA concluded....".  We can read thousands of pages of that right here.