I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[Rob Caprio]

The autopsy X-Rays and photographs were authenticated.

See:

HSCA Volume VI, page 232 - anthropological analysis
                          [age 239  - analysis of x-rays

Proves that the x-rays and photographs are those of JFK

Volume VII, page 43:  Report of Ellis Kerly, Phd, and Clyde Snow, Phd. anthopological consultants

Volume VII, page 63:  Report of Lowell Levine, DDS, on dential identification

Volume VII, page 69 - Report of Frank Scott, medical photographer on the authenticity of the color photographs.

If these experts weren't at Bethesda Naval Hospital on 11/22/63 to see the X-rays and photographs then, how can they authenticate the ones presented to them in the 1970s? Please explain that.

[Fred Litwin]

If these experts weren't at Bethesda Naval Hospital on 11/22/63 to see the X-rays and photographs then, how can they authenticate the ones presented to them in the 1970s? Please explain that.

Perhaps you should read the sections I have cited, and then ask your questions. Have you read the HSCA volumes or not?

[Rob Caprio]

Perhaps you should read the sections I have cited, and then ask your questions. Have you read the HSCA volumes or not?

You didn't answer my question. How did they know that these were X-rays and photographs taken during the JFK autopsy?

[Fred Litwin]

You didn't answer my question. How did they know that these were X-rays and photographs taken during the JFK autopsy?

I did, but you don't like my answer. Have you read the HSCA Volumes of evidence?  Why don't you read the authentication
reports that I referenced. You might find the answers you are looking for?

[John Iacoletti]

I did, but you don't like my answer. Have you read the HSCA Volumes of evidence?  Why don't you read the authentication
reports that I referenced. You might find the answers you are looking for?

The reports you referenced actually say nothing about when the X-rays and photographs were taken.

[Rob Caprio]

I did, but you don't like my answer. Have you read the HSCA Volumes of evidence?  Why don't you read the authentication
reports that I referenced. You might find the answers you are looking for?

You didn't answer it. None of those experts were at the autopsy in 1963, thus, they could only go by what they were told. Their supposed authentication of what they were provided means nothing since they have no idea if they truly depict the wounds seen on 11/22-11/23/63.

The current autopsy photographs and X-rays do not match the wounds seen by witnesses who viewed the body. It is clear that you put more weight with the HSCA then the contemperaneous witnesses.

Even IF they were authentic (and they're not based on the PH witnesses and others), how do they prove that LHO was the shooter as you claim?

[John Iacoletti]

Even IF they were authentic (and they're not based on the PH witnesses and others), how do they prove that LHO was the shooter as you claim?

Fred has been avoiding that question for 4 pages now...

[W. Tracy Parnell]

The current autopsy photographs and X-rays do not match the wounds seen by witnesses who viewed the body. It is clear that you put more weight with the HSCA then the contemperaneous witnesses.

Even IF they were authentic (and they're not based on the PH witnesses and others), how do they prove that LHO was the shooter as you claim?

Pardon me butting in but you can't rely on witnesses. Studies by Elizabeth Loftus and others have shown that. So, yes I put more weight with the HSCA. And other evidence shows LHO was the shooter who was firing from the rear. And before you ask for proof, check Bugliosi's list of evidence for LHO being the shooter or David Von Pein's website or book.