I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[Fred Litwin]

How's it feel? You have yet to answer several of my questions. What evidence stopped you from being a "freak" and converted you to a LNer?

And, how did the HSCA experts know that the autopsy X-rays and photographs they were provided with were the ones taken on November 22-23, 1963?

Why don't you read the evidence that I cited?  You were desperate for me to cite evidence. I did. You refuse to read it. You want me to answer
your questions about it. Just how lazy are you?

[Rob Caprio]

JFK was lying on the back of is head. Any wound there would not have been visible. The autopsy photos as well as the Zapruder film show the wound clearly. The witnesses were simply mistaken.

Are you even familiar with the evidence? They were not mistaken. You wish that they were, but they weren't.

The nurse I quoted was asked to apply pressure to the wound. How do you think she could do this without seeing the wound?

[Rob Caprio]

Why don't you read the evidence that I cited?  You were desperate for me to cite evidence. I did. You refuse to read it. You want me to answer
your questions about it. Just how lazy are you?

Nice dodge. So you can't show that the autopsy X-rays and photographs provided to the HSCA experts were the ones taken on November 22-23, 1963. Got it.

Why you think that LHO was the shooter remains a mystery.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Are you even familiar with the evidence? They were not mistaken. You wish that they were, but they weren't.

The nurse I quoted was asked to apply pressure to the wound. How do you think she could do this without seeing the wound?

She couldn't. And if he was lying on his back, which he was, the alleged wound would be invisible to her. You should study the available literature on eye witnesses, it is amazing how wrong they can be.

[Rob Caprio]

She couldn't. And if he was lying on his back, which he was, the alleged wound would be invisible to her. You should study the available literature on eye witnesses, it is amazing how wrong they can be.

Silly. She was a trained professional. Was JFK on his back in the limousine? You weren't there, she was. So were many others.

Denial is the best friend of the LNers.

[John Iacoletti]

Pardon me butting in but you can't rely on witnesses. Studies by Elizabeth Loftus and others have shown that. So, yes I put more weight with the HSCA. And other evidence shows LHO was the shooter who was firing from the rear. And before you ask for proof, check Bugliosi's list of evidence for LHO being the shooter or David Von Pein's website or book.

Neither Bugliosi or Von Pein prove who the shooter was.  It's all assumptions and rhetoric.

In fact, 90% of Bugliosi's "evidence" relies on witness statements that you just called out as unreliable.

[John Iacoletti]

Not true Four Dallas doctors examined the autopsy x-rays and photos and told the NOVA science show on PBS that the photos and x-rays were consistent with what they saw.

"Consistent with" is lawyer rhetoric meaning "inconclusive".