In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[Jon Banks]

March 20, 1964 at Parkland Hospital.

Where in Tomlinson?s testimony did he identify CE 399 as the Parkland Bullet?

The FBI made a great effort to try to cover up the fact that neither Wright nor Tomlinson believed CE 399 was the Parkland stretcher bullet

[Martin Weidmann]

Where in Tomlinson?s testimony did he identify CE 399 as the Parkland Bullet?

The FBI made a great effort to try to cover up the fact that neither Wright nor Tomlinson believed CE 399 was the Parkland stretcher bullet

Where in Tomlinson?s testimony did he identify CE 399 as the Parkland Bullet?

Good question. I'd love to read the answer, especially since the WC did not enter CE 399 into evidence until after Tomlinson had testified.

[Martin Weidmann]

This is particularly startling and noteworthy when one stops to realize that those making the allegation of conspiracy necessarily have the burden of proof. I mean, it makes no sense for A to say to B, ?I allege that there is a conspiracy here. Now you prove there isn?t.? The alleger always, by definition, has the burden of proof.
RHVB

JohnM

Poor misguided Johnny,

I am not making any allegation or claim.

I am perfectly willing to accept CE399 as authentic evidence after you prove that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 is the actual bullet that was found by Tomlinson at Parkland Hospital.

Can you prove that, John?

[John Mytton]

Poor misguided Johnny,

I am not making any allegation or claim.

I am perfectly willing to accept CE399 as authentic evidence after you prove that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 is the actual bullet that was found by Tomlinson at Parkland Hospital.

Can you prove that, John?

If you can't answer the OP then just say so.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

If you can't answer the OP then just say so.

JohnM

Still running and playing silly games, I see?.

Do you secretly hope that no one will notice?

[John Iacoletti]

This is particularly startling and noteworthy when one stops to realize that those making the allegation of conspiracy necessarily have the burden of proof. I mean, it makes no sense for A to say to B, ?I allege that there is a conspiracy here. Now you prove there isn?t.? The alleger always, by definition, has the burden of proof.
RHVB

Bugliosi finally got something right.  Pity that he couldn't meet his own burden of proof.

[John Mytton]

Bugliosi finally got something right.  Pity that he couldn't meet his own burden of proof.

Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

JohnM

Johnny still doesn't understand that an appeal to authority (even one as flawed as this one) is nothing more than a well known fallacy