In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[Royell Storing]

Here is the official autopsy report and what do you know, Ford was just correcting their rough draft with actual medical evidence. Oops!


https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix-09.pdf

JohnM

       I notice you have conveniently Omitted the Autopsy Face Sheet depiction of the location of the Back Wound, in addition to autopsy photos of the same back wound. These would be "actual medical evidence".  Typical. Plus, the description you have underlined above describes the Damage inflicted by the bullet. NOT the Entry Point of the bullet.

[Bill Chapman]

The FBI eventually admitted that they destroyed evidence.

Tha OP asks for manufactured or planted evidence
Nor destroyed evidence

[John Mytton]

       I notice you have conveniently Omitted the Autopsy Face Sheet depiction of the location of the Back Wound, in addition to autopsy photos of the same back wound. These would be "actual medical evidence".  Typical. Plus, the description you have underlined above describes the Damage inflicted by the bullet. NOT the Entry Point of the bullet.

Sorry Royell, but all your squirming won't change the fact that all Ford did was change the wording to accurately reflect what was written in the Autopsy Report. Try again.

JohnM

[Colin Crow]

Tha OP asks for manufactured or planted evidence
Nor destroyed evidence

Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.

[Bill Chapman]

Sorry Royell, but all your squirming won't change the fact that all Ford did was change the wording to accurately reflect what was written in the Autopsy Report. Try again.

JohnM

Why are people talking about destroyed evidence
Your OP clearly asks for manufactured or planted evidence

[Martin Weidmann]

Thanks Mark.

The Limo was thoroughly inspected and photographed beforehand and after travelling 60 miles per hour and all the maneuvering to remove the wounded would likely imo make any blood spatter analysis difficult.

The only way we found out about the burning was through Humes himself so where can this possibly go from here?

This was more about covering the FBI's ass rather than having any affect on case against Oswald.

Yeah, it makes you wonder why the conspirators would commit the assassination in Dallas and then be forced to move the body back to where they were more in control when the simple alternative of performing the murder on the other side of the country with no problems would have to be a no brainer.

Well they can't Xray under the boxes, so the boxes had to be moved at some point.

You bring up some interesting discrepancies but as I have pointed out nothing above would have any significant impact on the prosecution's case.

JohnM

This was more about covering the FBI's ass rather than having any affect on case against Oswald.

And you know this with any kind of certainty, how?

Well they can't Xray under the boxes, so the boxes had to be moved at some point.

They X-rayed the boxes in the sniper's nest? Really?

[Bill Chapman]

Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.

Or have John add 'destroyed' to his OP
Might widen the net, possibly resulting in a 'deadlier catch'

[John Mytton]

Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.

I've altered the thread title to accommodate your post, sorry for the inconvenience.

JohnM