One of the strawman brothers again suggests that evidence is suspect but I'm sure he doesn't mean to imply anything sinister. Oswald didn't have his wedding ring on when photographed after his arrest. You can see it is not on his finger (he wore it on his right hand in the Russian tradition) in photographs. But here we have the baseless suggestion of someone who is not "sure he actually left his wedding ring" despite testimony from Marina that is was left for the first and only time of their marriage on the very morning Oswald is arrested for the assassination of the president. What bad luck. I guess the plan was to remove Oswald's wedding ring, somehow plant it back at the Paine house or get Marina to lie about it for the purpose of providing evidence that is not evidence of Oswald's guilt according to the strawman brothers. Great plan. Seems like a lot of effort given the mountain of evidence that already linked Oswald to the crime. They have to pile on by adding his wedding ring into the mix at significant risk. What if someone in the crowd had a film or photo of Oswald with his ring on etc. It's ludicrous.
Yes, it's ludicrous, but it's just a reflex action by the Saint Patsy wannabe defense team to try to dispute every single piece of evidence in the case.
They can't help themselves.
